Swimmer profile

Cece Bourne

Female15-16Chico Aqua-JetsSN · WESTERN

SR Rating

NCAA D1 cut anchored • 2026 season
age 16
Current (today)
442
Building Base

Based on current PBs vs. NCAA D1 cut times.

  • #1100 Free SCY1:03.43450
  • #250 Free SCY29.15447
  • #3100 Back SCY1:10.08424
  • #4500 Free SCY6:24.34402
Projected (age 17)
445
Building Base

Trajectory projected to end of high-school junior year — recruiting peak.

  • #1100 Free SCY1:03.10457
  • #250 Free SCY29.15447
  • #3100 Back SCY1:10.08424
  • #4500 Free SCY6:20.53414
College Ceiling (age 21)
448range 442456
Building Base

College junior year. Range reflects developmental uncertainty — wider for younger swimmers and late developers.

  • #1100 Free SCY1:02.70466
  • #250 Free SCY29.15447
  • #3100 Back SCY1:10.08424
  • #4500 Free SCY6:24.34402
Coach viewPIe ≈ 89(68100)

Refine your College CeilingTesting

Tell us about your swimmer’s growth. We use trajectory data by default; your input fine-tunes the ceiling range. Not saved — refresh resets to default.

What this means for Cece

Building toward recruiting peak — currently Building Base.

Recruiting conversations start in earnest at the end of sophomore year (NCAA contact rules let coaches reach out June 15 of sophomore year for most sports including swimming). Your projected rating (445 → Building Base) is the more meaningful number for that window. Continue building broad event coverage — the top-4 weighting rewards multiple strong events.

What time drops unlock D2/D3 Realistic

Each row shows the time required in that event alone to push SR Rating Current from 442 to 600, holding the other three events fixed. Only physiologically reachable drops (≤15% per event) are shown. In practice swimmers improve across multiple events at once, so real progress will lift faster than these single-event deltas suggest.

No single-event drop within reachable bounds gets 442 all the way to 600. The gap from Building Base to D2/D3 Realistic closes through broad improvement — multiple events moving together. That’s exactly what college coaches want to see; specialists rarely make this jump on one event alone.

Best school matches

Top 5 of 156 curated programs that actually fit. Use the picker below to evaluate any other school.

Pilot data

Swarthmore College

WomenCentennialD3

Match

Your Team Fit

564

Recruit median

540

In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.

Skidmore College

WomenLiberty LeagueD3

Match

Your Team Fit

509

Recruit median

470

In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.

Marywood University

WomenCSACD3

Safety

Your Team Fit

424

Recruit median

380

Above this program's typical recruit median — you're a top-of-class addition.

Susquehanna University

WomenMACD3

Safety

Your Team Fit

476

Recruit median

430

Above this program's typical recruit median — you're a top-of-class addition.

Luther College

WomenARCD3

Safety

Your Team Fit

484

Recruit median

430

Above this program's typical recruit median — you're a top-of-class addition.

Selection: Realistic-tier first (sorted by Team Fit), padded with closest Reach or Stretch only if fewer than 5 Realistic matches exist. Display order: D1 → D2 → D3 within the picks. How is this calculated?

Custom college fit

Pick a specific school to see the full per-event analysis.

682 programs catalogued across NCAA D1, D2, and D3. Roughly half have real scraped rosters; the rest run on calibrated placeholder data while the T-166 cleanup expands coverage.