Swimmer profile

Kate Rebro

Female15-16Piedmont Swim TeamPC · WESTERN

SR Rating

NCAA D1 cut anchored • 2026 season
Late developerage 16
Current (today)
748
D2/D3 Realistic

Based on current PBs vs. NCAA D1 cut times.

  • #1100 Free SCY53.29759
  • #250 Free SCY24.44758
  • #3100 Fly SCY58.26733
  • #4200 Free SCY2:01.16661
Projected (age 17)
837
D1 Mid-Major

Trajectory projected to end of high-school junior year — recruiting peak.

  • #1100 Free SCY50.95868
  • #250 Free SCY23.66835
  • #3100 Fly SCY56.38808
  • #4200 Free SCY1:57.59723
College Ceiling (age 21)
1109range 7481158
Blue Chip

College junior year. Range reflects developmental uncertainty — wider for younger swimmers and late developers.

  • #1100 Free SCYCONF46.171166
  • #250 Free SCY21.601097
  • #3100 Fly SCY51.451064
  • #4200 Free SCY1:48.16929
Coach viewPIe ≈ 26(2229)typical outcome D3 (69%)

Refine your College CeilingTesting

Tell us about your swimmer’s growth. We use trajectory data by default; your input fine-tunes the ceiling range. Not saved — refresh resets to default.

What this means for Kate

Building toward recruiting peak — currently D2/D3 Realistic.

Recruiting conversations start in earnest at the end of sophomore year (NCAA contact rules let coaches reach out June 15 of sophomore year for most sports including swimming). Your projected rating (837 → D1 Mid-Major) is the more meaningful number for that window. Continue building broad event coverage — the top-4 weighting rewards multiple strong events.

Maturity context: Your data shows late-developer trajectory — continued steep improvement past age 15. That's exactly the kind of pattern that under-rates well-developed seniors but signals strong upside.

What time drops unlock D1 Mid-Major

Each row shows the time required in that event alone to push SR Rating Current from 748 to 750, holding the other three events fixed. Only physiologically reachable drops (≤15% per event) are shown. In practice swimmers improve across multiple events at once, so real progress will lift faster than these single-event deltas suggest.

EventCurrentTargetΔ
100 Free SCY53.2953.18−0.11s
50 Free SCY24.4424.39−0.05s
100 Fly SCY58.2657.96−0.30s
200 Free SCY2:01.161:59.33−1.83s

Best school matches

Top 5 of 169 curated programs that actually fit. Use the picker below to evaluate any other school.

Pilot data

University of Mississippi

WomenSECD1

Match

Your Team Fit

1002

Recruit median

940

In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.

Saint Leo University

WomenSSCD2

Match

Your Team Fit

963

Recruit median

920

In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.

Northern Michigan University

WomenGLIACD2

Match

Your Team Fit

963

Recruit median

890

In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.

Missouri University of Science and Tech

WomenGLVCD2

Match

Your Team Fit

963

Recruit median

880

In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.

Truman State University

WomenGLVCD2

Match

Your Team Fit

963

Recruit median

920

In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.

Selection: Realistic-tier first (sorted by Team Fit), padded with closest Reach or Stretch only if fewer than 5 Realistic matches exist. Display order: D1 → D2 → D3 within the picks. How is this calculated?

Custom college fit

Pick a specific school to see the full per-event analysis.

682 programs catalogued across NCAA D1, D2, and D3. Roughly half have real scraped rosters; the rest run on calibrated placeholder data while the T-166 cleanup expands coverage.