Swimmer profile

Tom Kiersnowski

Male15-16ElitSwim ClubPC · WESTERN

SR Rating

NCAA D1 cut anchored • 2026 season
Late developerage 15
Current (today)
577
Building Base

Based on current PBs vs. NCAA D1 cut times.

  • #150 Free SCY23.08597
  • #2100 Back SCY55.68575
  • #3100 Free SCY51.85553
  • #4200 Free SCY1:55.72535
Projected (age 17)
871
D1 Mid-Major

Trajectory projected to end of high-school junior year — recruiting peak.

  • #1100 Back SCY48.10891
  • #2100 Fly SCY48.46862
  • #3100 Free SCY44.76859
  • #450 Free SCY20.60839
College Ceiling (age 21)
1167range 5771167
Blue Chip

College junior year. Range reflects developmental uncertainty — wider for younger swimmers and late developers.

  • #1100 Fly SCYCONF43.801167
  • #2100 Free SCYCONF40.421167
  • #350 Free SCYCONF18.461166
  • #4100 Back SCYCONF43.981166
Coach viewPIe ≈ 50(3156)typical outcome D3 (89%)
Why the College Ceiling lineup differs: 100 Fly SCY is improving fastest vs. the NCAA D1 cut, so it ranks into the top 4 at age 21 even though it isn't in today’s top 4. That’s a real recruiting signal — shows which event projects as the strongest college pathway.

Refine your College CeilingTesting

Tell us about your swimmer’s growth. We use trajectory data by default; your input fine-tunes the ceiling range. Not saved — refresh resets to default.

What this means for Tom

Building toward recruiting peak — currently Building Base.

Recruiting conversations start in earnest at the end of sophomore year (NCAA contact rules let coaches reach out June 15 of sophomore year for most sports including swimming). Your projected rating (871 → D1 Mid-Major) is the more meaningful number for that window. Continue building broad event coverage — the top-4 weighting rewards multiple strong events.

Maturity context: Your data shows late-developer trajectory — continued steep improvement past age 15. That's exactly the kind of pattern that under-rates well-developed seniors but signals strong upside.

What time drops unlock D2/D3 Realistic

Each row shows the time required in that event alone to push SR Rating Current from 577 to 600, holding the other three events fixed. Only physiologically reachable drops (≤15% per event) are shown. In practice swimmers improve across multiple events at once, so real progress will lift faster than these single-event deltas suggest.

EventCurrentTargetΔ
50 Free SCY23.0822.37−0.71s
100 Back SCY55.6853.92−1.76s
100 Free SCY51.8548.05−3.80s

Best school matches

Top 5 of 133 curated programs that actually fit. Use the picker below to evaluate any other school.

Pilot data

Nova Southeastern University

MenSSCD2

Match

Your Team Fit

1243

Recruit median

1150

In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.

Drury University

MenGLVCD2

Match

Your Team Fit

1243

Recruit median

1160

In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.

Duke University

MenACCD1

Match

Your Team Fit

1099

Recruit median

1000

In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.

University of Kentucky

MenSECD1

Match

Your Team Fit

1099

Recruit median

1030

In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.

University of Missouri

MenSECD1

Match

Your Team Fit

1099

Recruit median

1050

In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.

Selection: Realistic-tier first (sorted by Team Fit), padded with closest Reach or Stretch only if fewer than 5 Realistic matches exist. Display order: D1 → D2 → D3 within the picks. How is this calculated?

Custom college fit

Pick a specific school to see the full per-event analysis.

682 programs catalogued across NCAA D1, D2, and D3. Roughly half have real scraped rosters; the rest run on calibrated placeholder data while the T-166 cleanup expands coverage.