Swimmer profile

Shelby Williams

Female13-14Vicksburg Swim Association IncMS · SOUTHERN

SR Rating

NCAA D1 cut anchored • 2026 season
age 13
Current (today)
434
Building Base

Based on current PBs vs. NCAA D1 cut times.

  • #150 Free SCY28.49478
  • #2100 Free SCY1:04.72423
  • #3200 Free SCY2:26.32375
  • #4100 Back SCY1:13.70365
Projected (age 17)
1092
D1 Power 4

Trajectory projected to end of high-school junior year — recruiting peak.

  • #150 Free SCYCONF21.171166
  • #2100 Free SCYCONF46.991106
  • #3100 Back SCY53.51953
  • #4200 Free SCY1:49.49895
College Ceiling (age 21)
1148range 4341148
Blue Chip

College junior year. Range reflects developmental uncertainty — wider for younger swimmers and late developers.

  • #1100 Free SCYCONF46.171166
  • #250 Free SCYCONF21.171166
  • #3200 Free SCY1:42.421094
  • #4100 Back SCY51.591063
Coach viewPIe ≈ 89(68100)

Refine your College CeilingTesting

Tell us about your swimmer’s growth. We use trajectory data by default; your input fine-tunes the ceiling range. Not saved — refresh resets to default.

What this means for Shelby

Foundation years. Focus on broad event development.

Your swimmer's Current rating is 434 (Building Base). College coaches don't look at age-13 times — they look at junior-year times. Track the Projected number; that's what coaches will see when they evaluate in 2-3 years.

What time drops unlock D2/D3 Realistic

Each row shows the time required in that event alone to push SR Rating Current from 434 to 600, holding the other three events fixed. Only physiologically reachable drops (≤15% per event) are shown. In practice swimmers improve across multiple events at once, so real progress will lift faster than these single-event deltas suggest.

No single-event drop within reachable bounds gets 434 all the way to 600. The gap from Building Base to D2/D3 Realistic closes through broad improvement — multiple events moving together. That’s exactly what college coaches want to see; specialists rarely make this jump on one event alone.

Best school matches

Top 5 of 168 curated programs that actually fit. Use the picker below to evaluate any other school.

Pilot data

Harding University

WomenGACD2

Match

Your Team Fit

863

Recruit median

810

In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.

Michigan Technological University

WomenGLIACD2

Match

Your Team Fit

863

Recruit median

850

In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.

Maryville University

WomenGLVCD2

Match

Your Team Fit

863

Recruit median

820

In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.

William Jewell College

WomenGLVCD2

Match

Your Team Fit

863

Recruit median

810

In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.

Assumption University

WomenNE-10D2

Match

Your Team Fit

863

Recruit median

830

In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.

Selection: Realistic-tier first (sorted by Team Fit), padded with closest Reach or Stretch only if fewer than 5 Realistic matches exist. Display order: D1 → D2 → D3 within the picks. How is this calculated?

Custom college fit

Pick a specific school to see the full per-event analysis.

682 programs catalogued across NCAA D1, D2, and D3. Roughly half have real scraped rosters; the rest run on calibrated placeholder data while the T-166 cleanup expands coverage.