Swimmer profile
Ximena Schmitt
Female15-16El Paso Aqua PosseBO · SOUTHERN
SR Rating
NCAA D1 cut anchored • 2026 seasonBased on current PBs vs. NCAA D1 cut times.
- #1200 Breast SCY2:36.69588
- #2100 Breast SCY1:12.21582
- #3200 IM SCY2:26.51521
- #4100 Free SCY1:01.27499
Trajectory projected to end of high-school junior year — recruiting peak.
- #1200 Breast SCY2:24.62748
- #2100 Breast SCY1:07.94699
- #3200 IM SCY2:17.60629
- #4100 Free SCY56.99620
College junior year. Range reflects developmental uncertainty — wider for younger swimmers and late developers.
- #1200 Breast SCY2:09.281047
- #2100 Breast SCY1:02.40902
- #3100 Free SCY51.49841
- #4200 IM SCY2:06.04818
Refine your College CeilingTesting
Tell us about your swimmer’s growth. We use trajectory data by default; your input fine-tunes the ceiling range. Not saved — refresh resets to default.
What this means for Ximena
Building toward recruiting peak — currently Building Base.
Recruiting conversations start in earnest at the end of sophomore year (NCAA contact rules let coaches reach out June 15 of sophomore year for most sports including swimming). Your projected rating (702 → D2/D3 Realistic) is the more meaningful number for that window. Continue building broad event coverage — the top-4 weighting rewards multiple strong events.
Maturity context: Your data shows late-developer trajectory — continued steep improvement past age 15. That's exactly the kind of pattern that under-rates well-developed seniors but signals strong upside.
What time drops unlock D2/D3 Realistic
Each row shows the time required in that event alone to push SR Rating Current from 570 to 600, holding the other three events fixed. Only physiologically reachable drops (≤15% per event) are shown. In practice swimmers improve across multiple events at once, so real progress will lift faster than these single-event deltas suggest.
| Event | Current | Target | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| 200 Breast SCY | 2:36.69 | 2:30.34 | −6.35s |
| 100 Breast SCY | 1:12.21 | 1:09.26 | −2.95s |
| 200 IM SCY | 2:26.51 | 2:12.12 | −14.39s |
Best school matches
Top 5 of 167 curated programs that actually fit. Use the picker below to evaluate any other school.
Cal State Monterey Bay
Women • CCAA • D2
Your Team Fit
785
Recruit median
780
In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.
Southern Arkansas University
Women • GAC • D2
Your Team Fit
785
Recruit median
780
In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.
Franklin & Marshall College
Women • Centennial • D3
Your Team Fit
666
Recruit median
560
Above this program's typical recruit median — you're a top-of-class addition.
Gettysburg College
Women • Centennial • D3
Your Team Fit
771
Recruit median
550
Above this program's typical recruit median — you're a top-of-class addition.
Swarthmore College
Women • Centennial • D3
Your Team Fit
831
Recruit median
540
Above this program's typical recruit median — you're a top-of-class addition.
Selection: Realistic-tier first (sorted by Team Fit), padded with closest Reach or Stretch only if fewer than 5 Realistic matches exist. Display order: D1 → D2 → D3 within the picks. How is this calculated?
Custom college fit
Pick a specific school to see the full per-event analysis.
682 programs catalogued across NCAA D1, D2, and D3. Roughly half have real scraped rosters; the rest run on calibrated placeholder data while the T-166 cleanup expands coverage.