Swimmer profile
Rose Schneider
Female15-16Parkway-Rockwood Gateway Swim ClubOZ · CENTRAL
SR Rating
NCAA D1 cut anchored • 2026 seasonBased on current PBs vs. NCAA D1 cut times.
- #1500 Free SCY5:44.51558
- #2200 Free SCY2:10.44530
- #3100 Free SCY1:00.47519
- #4200 IM SCY2:27.61509
Trajectory projected to end of high-school junior year — recruiting peak.
- #1500 Free SCY4:59.07854
- #2200 Free SCY2:00.61670
- #3100 Free SCY55.58669
- #4200 Fly SCY2:16.82627
College junior year. Range reflects developmental uncertainty — wider for younger swimmers and late developers.
- #1500 Free SCYCONF4:29.521166
- #2200 Fly SCYCONF1:52.391131
- #3100 Free SCY49.39953
- #4200 Free SCY1:48.08931
Refine your College CeilingTesting
Tell us about your swimmer’s growth. We use trajectory data by default; your input fine-tunes the ceiling range. Not saved — refresh resets to default.
What this means for Rose
Building toward recruiting peak — currently Building Base.
Recruiting conversations start in earnest at the end of sophomore year (NCAA contact rules let coaches reach out June 15 of sophomore year for most sports including swimming). Your projected rating (739 → D2/D3 Realistic) is the more meaningful number for that window. Continue building broad event coverage — the top-4 weighting rewards multiple strong events.
Maturity context: Your data shows late-developer trajectory — continued steep improvement past age 15. That's exactly the kind of pattern that under-rates well-developed seniors but signals strong upside.
What time drops unlock D2/D3 Realistic
Each row shows the time required in that event alone to push SR Rating Current from 538 to 600, holding the other three events fixed. Only physiologically reachable drops (≤15% per event) are shown. In practice swimmers improve across multiple events at once, so real progress will lift faster than these single-event deltas suggest.
| Event | Current | Target | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| 500 Free SCY | 5:44.51 | 5:16.88 | −27.63s |
| 200 Free SCY | 2:10.44 | 1:59.50 | −10.94s |
Best school matches
Top 5 of 165 curated programs that actually fit. Use the picker below to evaluate any other school.
Hartwick College
Women • Empire 8 • D3
Your Team Fit
402
Recruit median
380
In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.
Gettysburg College
Women • Centennial • D3
Your Team Fit
617
Recruit median
550
Above this program's typical recruit median — you're a top-of-class addition.
Washington College
Women • Centennial • D3
Your Team Fit
546
Recruit median
440
Above this program's typical recruit median — you're a top-of-class addition.
University of Scranton
Women • Landmark • D3
Your Team Fit
586
Recruit median
460
Above this program's typical recruit median — you're a top-of-class addition.
Alfred University
Women • Empire 8 • D3
Your Team Fit
546
Recruit median
400
Above this program's typical recruit median — you're a top-of-class addition.
Selection: Realistic-tier first (sorted by Team Fit), padded with closest Reach or Stretch only if fewer than 5 Realistic matches exist. Display order: D1 → D2 → D3 within the picks. How is this calculated?
Custom college fit
Pick a specific school to see the full per-event analysis.
682 programs catalogued across NCAA D1, D2, and D3. Roughly half have real scraped rosters; the rest run on calibrated placeholder data while the T-166 cleanup expands coverage.