Swimmer profile

Alivia Thygesen

Female15-16Lincoln Select SwimmingMW · CENTRAL

SR Rating

NCAA D1 cut anchored • 2026 season
age 15
Current (today)
449
Building Base

Based on current PBs vs. NCAA D1 cut times.

  • #1100 Back SCY1:06.73491
  • #2100 Free SCY1:04.72423
  • #3200 IM SCY2:37.35421
  • #450 Free SCY29.78419
Projected (age 17)
517
Building Base

Trajectory projected to end of high-school junior year — recruiting peak.

  • #1100 Back SCY1:03.22578
  • #2100 Free SCY1:01.84485
  • #350 Free SCY28.57474
  • #4200 Free SCY2:19.00438
College Ceiling (age 21)
449range 449449
Building Base

College junior year. Range reflects developmental uncertainty — wider for younger swimmers and late developers.

  • #1100 Back SCY1:06.73491
  • #2100 Free SCY1:04.72423
  • #3200 IM SCY2:37.35421
  • #450 Free SCY29.78419
Coach viewPIe ≈ 89(68100)

Refine your College CeilingTesting

Tell us about your swimmer’s growth. We use trajectory data by default; your input fine-tunes the ceiling range. Not saved — refresh resets to default.

What this means for Alivia

Building toward recruiting peak — currently Building Base.

Recruiting conversations start in earnest at the end of sophomore year (NCAA contact rules let coaches reach out June 15 of sophomore year for most sports including swimming). Your projected rating (517 → Building Base) is the more meaningful number for that window. Continue building broad event coverage — the top-4 weighting rewards multiple strong events.

What time drops unlock D2/D3 Realistic

Each row shows the time required in that event alone to push SR Rating Current from 449 to 600, holding the other three events fixed. Only physiologically reachable drops (≤15% per event) are shown. In practice swimmers improve across multiple events at once, so real progress will lift faster than these single-event deltas suggest.

No single-event drop within reachable bounds gets 449 all the way to 600. The gap from Building Base to D2/D3 Realistic closes through broad improvement — multiple events moving together. That’s exactly what college coaches want to see; specialists rarely make this jump on one event alone.

Best school matches

Top 5 of 157 curated programs that actually fit. Use the picker below to evaluate any other school.

Pilot data

Swarthmore College

WomenCentennialD3

Match

Your Team Fit

569

Recruit median

540

In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.

Union College (NY)

WomenLiberty LeagueD3

Match

Your Team Fit

495

Recruit median

490

In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.

University of Scranton

WomenLandmarkD3

Match

Your Team Fit

480

Recruit median

460

In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.

Skidmore College

WomenLiberty LeagueD3

Match

Your Team Fit

480

Recruit median

470

In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.

Arcadia University

WomenMACD3

Match

Your Team Fit

418

Recruit median

400

In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.

Selection: Realistic-tier first (sorted by Team Fit), padded with closest Reach or Stretch only if fewer than 5 Realistic matches exist. Display order: D1 → D2 → D3 within the picks. How is this calculated?

Custom college fit

Pick a specific school to see the full per-event analysis.

682 programs catalogued across NCAA D1, D2, and D3. Roughly half have real scraped rosters; the rest run on calibrated placeholder data while the T-166 cleanup expands coverage.