Swimmer profile
Amy Jiang
Female13-14Irvine NovaquaticsSO · WESTERN
SR Rating
NCAA D1 cut anchored • 2026 seasonBased on current PBs vs. NCAA D1 cut times.
- #1200 Fly SCY2:08.74753
- #2400 IM SCY4:40.19738
- #3200 Breast SCY2:26.75716
- #4100 Fly SCY59.07703
Trajectory projected to end of high-school junior year — recruiting peak.
- #1200 Fly SCYCONF1:51.251167
- #2100 Fly SCYCONF50.571120
- #3400 IM SCY4:09.081050
- #41650 Free SCY16:52.22922
College junior year. Range reflects developmental uncertainty — wider for younger swimmers and late developers.
- #1100 Fly SCYCONF49.891167
- #2200 Fly SCYCONF1:51.251167
- #3400 IM SCYCONF4:00.541166
- #41650 Free SCY16:13.881036
Refine your College CeilingTesting
Tell us about your swimmer’s growth. We use trajectory data by default; your input fine-tunes the ceiling range. Not saved — refresh resets to default.
What this means for Amy
Building toward recruiting peak — currently D2/D3 Realistic.
Recruiting conversations start in earnest at the end of sophomore year (NCAA contact rules let coaches reach out June 15 of sophomore year for most sports including swimming). Your projected rating (1115 → Blue Chip) is the more meaningful number for that window. Continue building broad event coverage — the top-4 weighting rewards multiple strong events.
What time drops unlock D1 Mid-Major
Each row shows the time required in that event alone to push SR Rating Current from 738 to 750, holding the other three events fixed. Only physiologically reachable drops (≤15% per event) are shown. In practice swimmers improve across multiple events at once, so real progress will lift faster than these single-event deltas suggest.
| Event | Current | Target | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| 200 Fly SCY | 2:08.74 | 2:07.04 | −1.70s |
| 400 IM SCY | 4:40.19 | 4:36.42 | −3.77s |
| 200 Breast SCY | 2:26.75 | 2:21.98 | −4.77s |
| 100 Fly SCY | 59.07 | 54.36 | −4.71s |
Best school matches
Top 5 of 169 curated programs that actually fit. Use the picker below to evaluate any other school.
Ohio State University
Women • Big Ten • D1
Your Team Fit
1157
Recruit median
1130
In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.
University of Alabama
Women • SEC • D1
Your Team Fit
1157
Recruit median
1080
In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.
Texas A&M University
Women • SEC • D1
Your Team Fit
1157
Recruit median
1110
In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.
University of Minnesota
Women • Big Ten • D1
Your Team Fit
1156
Recruit median
1070
In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.
University of Southern California
Women • Big Ten • D1
Your Team Fit
1153
Recruit median
1100
In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.
Selection: Realistic-tier first (sorted by Team Fit), padded with closest Reach or Stretch only if fewer than 5 Realistic matches exist. Display order: D1 → D2 → D3 within the picks. How is this calculated?
Custom college fit
Pick a specific school to see the full per-event analysis.
682 programs catalogued across NCAA D1, D2, and D3. Roughly half have real scraped rosters; the rest run on calibrated placeholder data while the T-166 cleanup expands coverage.