Swimmer profile

Cecilia Katona

Female15-16Puma Aquatic TeamSCS · WESTERN

SR Rating

NCAA D1 cut anchored • 2026 season
Late developerage 15
Current (today)
584
Building Base

Based on current PBs vs. NCAA D1 cut times.

  • #150 Free SCY25.58661
  • #2100 Free SCY59.11556
  • #3100 Back SCY1:05.69515
  • #4200 Back SCY2:29.81450
Projected (age 17)
710
D2/D3 Realistic

Trajectory projected to end of high-school junior year — recruiting peak.

  • #150 Free SCY24.14786
  • #2100 Free SCY55.06688
  • #3100 Back SCY1:00.86647
  • #4200 Back SCY2:22.38524
College Ceiling (age 21)
933range 5841050
D1 Mid-MajorD1 Power 4

College junior year. Range reflects developmental uncertainty — wider for younger swimmers and late developers.

  • #150 Free SCY22.271001
  • #2100 Free SCY49.86926
  • #3100 Back SCY54.69892
  • #4200 Back SCY2:12.60649
Coach viewPIe ≈ 49(3056)typical outcome D3 (82%)

Refine your College CeilingTesting

Tell us about your swimmer’s growth. We use trajectory data by default; your input fine-tunes the ceiling range. Not saved — refresh resets to default.

What this means for Cecilia

Building toward recruiting peak — currently Building Base.

Recruiting conversations start in earnest at the end of sophomore year (NCAA contact rules let coaches reach out June 15 of sophomore year for most sports including swimming). Your projected rating (710 → D2/D3 Realistic) is the more meaningful number for that window. Continue building broad event coverage — the top-4 weighting rewards multiple strong events.

Maturity context: Your data shows late-developer trajectory — continued steep improvement past age 15. That's exactly the kind of pattern that under-rates well-developed seniors but signals strong upside.

What time drops unlock D2/D3 Realistic

Each row shows the time required in that event alone to push SR Rating Current from 584 to 600, holding the other three events fixed. Only physiologically reachable drops (≤15% per event) are shown. In practice swimmers improve across multiple events at once, so real progress will lift faster than these single-event deltas suggest.

EventCurrentTargetΔ
50 Free SCY25.5825.07−0.51s
100 Free SCY59.1157.71−1.40s
100 Back SCY1:05.691:01.88−3.81s
200 Back SCY2:29.812:08.13−21.68s

Best school matches

Top 5 of 166 curated programs that actually fit. Use the picker below to evaluate any other school.

Pilot data

Southern Arkansas University

WomenGACD2

Match

Your Team Fit

797

Recruit median

780

In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.

Cal State Monterey Bay

WomenCCAAD2

Match

Your Team Fit

797

Recruit median

780

In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.

Messiah University

WomenMACD3

Safety

Your Team Fit

656

Recruit median

470

Above this program's typical recruit median — you're a top-of-class addition.

Gettysburg College

WomenCentennialD3

Safety

Your Team Fit

794

Recruit median

550

Above this program's typical recruit median — you're a top-of-class addition.

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute

WomenLiberty LeagueD3

Safety

Your Team Fit

724

Recruit median

480

Above this program's typical recruit median — you're a top-of-class addition.

Selection: Realistic-tier first (sorted by Team Fit), padded with closest Reach or Stretch only if fewer than 5 Realistic matches exist. Display order: D1 → D2 → D3 within the picks. How is this calculated?

Custom college fit

Pick a specific school to see the full per-event analysis.

682 programs catalogued across NCAA D1, D2, and D3. Roughly half have real scraped rosters; the rest run on calibrated placeholder data while the T-166 cleanup expands coverage.