Swimmer profile
Emma Chen Chen
Female15-16Brea AquaticsSCS · WESTERN
SR Rating
NCAA D1 cut anchored • 2026 seasonBased on current PBs vs. NCAA D1 cut times.
- #1100 Fly SCY1:06.34496
- #250 Free SCY29.50431
- #3100 Free SCY1:04.38430
- #4200 IM SCY2:36.17430
Trajectory projected to end of high-school junior year — recruiting peak.
- #150 Free SCY25.58661
- #2100 Fly SCY1:02.71587
- #3200 IM SCY2:23.09559
- #4100 Breast SCY1:14.38533
College junior year. Range reflects developmental uncertainty — wider for younger swimmers and late developers.
- #150 Free SCYCONF21.171166
- #2200 IM SCY2:06.60807
- #3200 Free SCY1:54.71779
- #4100 Back SCY58.06746
Refine your College CeilingTesting
Tell us about your swimmer’s growth. We use trajectory data by default; your input fine-tunes the ceiling range. Not saved — refresh resets to default.
What this means for Emma
Building toward recruiting peak — currently Building Base.
Recruiting conversations start in earnest at the end of sophomore year (NCAA contact rules let coaches reach out June 15 of sophomore year for most sports including swimming). Your projected rating (608 → D2/D3 Realistic) is the more meaningful number for that window. Continue building broad event coverage — the top-4 weighting rewards multiple strong events.
Maturity context: Your data shows late-developer trajectory — continued steep improvement past age 15. That's exactly the kind of pattern that under-rates well-developed seniors but signals strong upside.
What time drops unlock D2/D3 Realistic
Each row shows the time required in that event alone to push SR Rating Current from 456 to 600, holding the other three events fixed. Only physiologically reachable drops (≤15% per event) are shown. In practice swimmers improve across multiple events at once, so real progress will lift faster than these single-event deltas suggest.
No single-event drop within reachable bounds gets 456 all the way to 600. The gap from Building Base to D2/D3 Realistic closes through broad improvement — multiple events moving together. That’s exactly what college coaches want to see; specialists rarely make this jump on one event alone.
Best school matches
Top 5 of 164 curated programs that actually fit. Use the picker below to evaluate any other school.
Hartwick College
Women • Empire 8 • D3
Your Team Fit
435
Recruit median
380
Above this program's typical recruit median — you're a top-of-class addition.
Drew University
Women • Landmark • D3
Your Team Fit
464
Recruit median
400
Above this program's typical recruit median — you're a top-of-class addition.
Franklin College
Women • HCAC • D3
Your Team Fit
466
Recruit median
390
Above this program's typical recruit median — you're a top-of-class addition.
Dickinson College
Women • Centennial • D3
Your Team Fit
608
Recruit median
500
Above this program's typical recruit median — you're a top-of-class addition.
Skidmore College
Women • Liberty League • D3
Your Team Fit
583
Recruit median
470
Above this program's typical recruit median — you're a top-of-class addition.
Selection: Realistic-tier first (sorted by Team Fit), padded with closest Reach or Stretch only if fewer than 5 Realistic matches exist. Display order: D1 → D2 → D3 within the picks. How is this calculated?
Custom college fit
Pick a specific school to see the full per-event analysis.
682 programs catalogued across NCAA D1, D2, and D3. Roughly half have real scraped rosters; the rest run on calibrated placeholder data while the T-166 cleanup expands coverage.