Swimmer profile
Elsa Nave
Female15-16Bozeman Barracudas Swim TeamMT · WESTERN
SR Rating
NCAA D1 cut anchored • 2026 seasonBased on current PBs vs. NCAA D1 cut times.
- #1200 Free SCY2:12.86501
- #2500 Free SCY6:00.32488
- #3200 Back SCY2:28.69460
- #4100 Free SCY1:02.98460
Trajectory projected to end of high-school junior year — recruiting peak.
- #1200 IM SCY2:15.31661
- #2200 Back SCY2:12.58649
- #3200 Free SCY2:03.03631
- #4100 Breast SCY1:12.50575
College junior year. Range reflects developmental uncertainty — wider for younger swimmers and late developers.
- #1200 IM SCYCONF1:53.731114
- #2200 Back SCY1:52.931051
- #3200 Free SCY1:50.49871
- #4100 Breast SCY1:05.19791
Refine your College CeilingTesting
Tell us about your swimmer’s growth. We use trajectory data by default; your input fine-tunes the ceiling range. Not saved — refresh resets to default.
What this means for Elsa
Building toward recruiting peak — currently Building Base.
Recruiting conversations start in earnest at the end of sophomore year (NCAA contact rules let coaches reach out June 15 of sophomore year for most sports including swimming). Your projected rating (647 → D2/D3 Realistic) is the more meaningful number for that window. Continue building broad event coverage — the top-4 weighting rewards multiple strong events.
Maturity context: Your data shows late-developer trajectory — continued steep improvement past age 15. That's exactly the kind of pattern that under-rates well-developed seniors but signals strong upside.
What time drops unlock D2/D3 Realistic
Each row shows the time required in that event alone to push SR Rating Current from 487 to 600, holding the other three events fixed. Only physiologically reachable drops (≤15% per event) are shown. In practice swimmers improve across multiple events at once, so real progress will lift faster than these single-event deltas suggest.
| Event | Current | Target | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| 200 Free SCY | 2:12.86 | 1:54.12 | −18.74s |
| 500 Free SCY | 6:00.32 | 5:08.48 | −51.84s |
Best school matches
Top 5 of 168 curated programs that actually fit. Use the picker below to evaluate any other school.
Franklin College
Women • HCAC • D3
Your Team Fit
393
Recruit median
390
In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.
Hartwick College
Women • Empire 8 • D3
Your Team Fit
387
Recruit median
380
In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.
Gettysburg College
Women • Centennial • D3
Your Team Fit
696
Recruit median
550
Above this program's typical recruit median — you're a top-of-class addition.
Augustana College (IL)
Women • CCIW • D3
Your Team Fit
592
Recruit median
420
Above this program's typical recruit median — you're a top-of-class addition.
Swarthmore College
Women • Centennial • D3
Your Team Fit
715
Recruit median
540
Above this program's typical recruit median — you're a top-of-class addition.
Selection: Realistic-tier first (sorted by Team Fit), padded with closest Reach or Stretch only if fewer than 5 Realistic matches exist. Display order: D1 → D2 → D3 within the picks. How is this calculated?
Custom college fit
Pick a specific school to see the full per-event analysis.
682 programs catalogued across NCAA D1, D2, and D3. Roughly half have real scraped rosters; the rest run on calibrated placeholder data while the T-166 cleanup expands coverage.