Swimmer profile
Tilly Corbett
Female15-16Ellensburg Area Swim TeamIE · WESTERN
SR Rating
NCAA D1 cut anchored • 2026 seasonBased on current PBs vs. NCAA D1 cut times.
- #1100 Free SCY1:01.88485
- #250 Free SCY28.77464
- #3200 Free SCY2:16.61461
- #4500 Free SCY6:10.06451
Trajectory projected to end of high-school junior year — recruiting peak.
- #1100 Free SCY57.73597
- #2200 Free SCY2:06.10586
- #3200 Back SCY2:17.47582
- #4200 IM SCY2:24.20546
College junior year. Range reflects developmental uncertainty — wider for younger swimmers and late developers.
- #1200 Back SCY1:55.39985
- #2200 IM SCY2:02.09900
- #3100 Fly SCY55.03869
- #4200 Free SCY1:52.74820
Refine your College CeilingTesting
Tell us about your swimmer’s growth. We use trajectory data by default; your input fine-tunes the ceiling range. Not saved — refresh resets to default.
What this means for Tilly
Building toward recruiting peak — currently Building Base.
Recruiting conversations start in earnest at the end of sophomore year (NCAA contact rules let coaches reach out June 15 of sophomore year for most sports including swimming). Your projected rating (587 → Building Base) is the more meaningful number for that window. Continue building broad event coverage — the top-4 weighting rewards multiple strong events.
Maturity context: Your data shows late-developer trajectory — continued steep improvement past age 15. That's exactly the kind of pattern that under-rates well-developed seniors but signals strong upside.
What time drops unlock D2/D3 Realistic
Each row shows the time required in that event alone to push SR Rating Current from 471 to 600, holding the other three events fixed. Only physiologically reachable drops (≤15% per event) are shown. In practice swimmers improve across multiple events at once, so real progress will lift faster than these single-event deltas suggest.
No single-event drop within reachable bounds gets 471 all the way to 600. The gap from Building Base to D2/D3 Realistic closes through broad improvement — multiple events moving together. That’s exactly what college coaches want to see; specialists rarely make this jump on one event alone.
Best school matches
Top 5 of 155 curated programs that actually fit. Use the picker below to evaluate any other school.
Skidmore College
Women • Liberty League • D3
Your Team Fit
513
Recruit median
470
In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.
Luther College
Women • ARC • D3
Your Team Fit
531
Recruit median
430
Above this program's typical recruit median — you're a top-of-class addition.
Swarthmore College
Women • Centennial • D3
Your Team Fit
642
Recruit median
540
Above this program's typical recruit median — you're a top-of-class addition.
Bryn Mawr College
Women • Centennial • D3
Your Team Fit
544
Recruit median
410
Above this program's typical recruit median — you're a top-of-class addition.
Drew University
Women • Landmark • D3
Your Team Fit
544
Recruit median
400
Above this program's typical recruit median — you're a top-of-class addition.
Selection: Realistic-tier first (sorted by Team Fit), padded with closest Reach or Stretch only if fewer than 5 Realistic matches exist. Display order: D1 → D2 → D3 within the picks. How is this calculated?
Custom college fit
Pick a specific school to see the full per-event analysis.
682 programs catalogued across NCAA D1, D2, and D3. Roughly half have real scraped rosters; the rest run on calibrated placeholder data while the T-166 cleanup expands coverage.