Swimmer profile
Kira Schimbeck
Female15-16Southern Utah Swimming AssociationUT · WESTERN
SR Rating
NCAA D1 cut anchored • 2026 seasonBased on current PBs vs. NCAA D1 cut times.
- #150 Free SCY27.95507
- #2500 Free SCY6:00.15489
- #3100 Breast SCY1:17.84465
- #4200 Breast SCY2:50.07460
Trajectory projected to end of high-school junior year — recruiting peak.
- #150 Free SCY27.28545
- #2500 Free SCY5:50.36531
- #3100 Breast SCY1:14.94521
- #4200 Breast SCY2:43.53517
College junior year. Range reflects developmental uncertainty — wider for younger swimmers and late developers.
- #1200 Breast SCY2:26.53719
- #2100 Breast SCY1:07.40716
- #3500 Free SCY5:24.36669
- #450 Free SCY25.49668
Refine your College CeilingTesting
Tell us about your swimmer’s growth. We use trajectory data by default; your input fine-tunes the ceiling range. Not saved — refresh resets to default.
What this means for Kira
Building toward recruiting peak — currently Building Base.
Recruiting conversations start in earnest at the end of sophomore year (NCAA contact rules let coaches reach out June 15 of sophomore year for most sports including swimming). Your projected rating (534 → Building Base) is the more meaningful number for that window. Continue building broad event coverage — the top-4 weighting rewards multiple strong events.
Maturity context: Your data shows late-developer trajectory — continued steep improvement past age 15. That's exactly the kind of pattern that under-rates well-developed seniors but signals strong upside.
What time drops unlock D2/D3 Realistic
Each row shows the time required in that event alone to push SR Rating Current from 490 to 600, holding the other three events fixed. Only physiologically reachable drops (≤15% per event) are shown. In practice swimmers improve across multiple events at once, so real progress will lift faster than these single-event deltas suggest.
| Event | Current | Target | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| 50 Free SCY | 27.95 | 24.12 | −3.83s |
| 500 Free SCY | 6:00.15 | 5:09.46 | −50.69s |
Best school matches
Top 5 of 152 curated programs that actually fit. Use the picker below to evaluate any other school.
Messiah University
Women • MAC • D3
Your Team Fit
481
Recruit median
470
In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.
North Central College
Women • CCIW • D3
Your Team Fit
450
Recruit median
440
In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.
Hanover College
Women • HCAC • D3
Your Team Fit
416
Recruit median
400
In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.
Arcadia University
Women • MAC • D3
Your Team Fit
450
Recruit median
400
Above this program's typical recruit median — you're a top-of-class addition.
Illinois Wesleyan University
Women • CCIW • D3
Your Team Fit
521
Recruit median
470
Above this program's typical recruit median — you're a top-of-class addition.
Selection: Realistic-tier first (sorted by Team Fit), padded with closest Reach or Stretch only if fewer than 5 Realistic matches exist. Display order: D1 → D2 → D3 within the picks. How is this calculated?
Custom college fit
Pick a specific school to see the full per-event analysis.
682 programs catalogued across NCAA D1, D2, and D3. Roughly half have real scraped rosters; the rest run on calibrated placeholder data while the T-166 cleanup expands coverage.