Swimmer profile
Porter Keller
Male15-16Barracuda Aquatic ClubUT · WESTERN
SR Rating
NCAA D1 cut anchored • 2026 seasonBased on current PBs vs. NCAA D1 cut times.
- #1200 IM SCY2:07.09550
- #2200 Back SCY2:05.17543
- #3100 Back SCY57.24529
- #450 Free SCY24.30511
Trajectory projected to end of high-school junior year — recruiting peak.
- #1100 Back SCY53.56646
- #2200 IM SCY2:02.05621
- #350 Free SCY23.33578
- #4100 Free SCY51.43566
College junior year. Range reflects developmental uncertainty — wider for younger swimmers and late developers.
- #1100 Back SCYCONF44.471128
- #2100 Fly SCY44.931081
- #3200 IM SCY1:49.00872
- #4100 Free SCY45.57814
Refine your College CeilingTesting
Tell us about your swimmer’s growth. We use trajectory data by default; your input fine-tunes the ceiling range. Not saved — refresh resets to default.
What this means for Porter
Building toward recruiting peak — currently Building Base.
Recruiting conversations start in earnest at the end of sophomore year (NCAA contact rules let coaches reach out June 15 of sophomore year for most sports including swimming). Your projected rating (620 → D2/D3 Realistic) is the more meaningful number for that window. Continue building broad event coverage — the top-4 weighting rewards multiple strong events.
Maturity context: Your data shows late-developer trajectory — continued steep improvement past age 15. That's exactly the kind of pattern that under-rates well-developed seniors but signals strong upside.
What time drops unlock D2/D3 Realistic
Each row shows the time required in that event alone to push SR Rating Current from 542 to 600, holding the other three events fixed. Only physiologically reachable drops (≤15% per event) are shown. In practice swimmers improve across multiple events at once, so real progress will lift faster than these single-event deltas suggest.
| Event | Current | Target | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| 200 IM SCY | 2:07.09 | 1:57.30 | −9.79s |
| 200 Back SCY | 2:05.17 | 1:55.43 | −9.74s |
Best school matches
Top 5 of 124 curated programs that actually fit. Use the picker below to evaluate any other school.
Franklin & Marshall College
Men • Centennial • D3
Your Team Fit
555
Recruit median
550
In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.
Loras College
Men • ARC • D3
Your Team Fit
415
Recruit median
410
In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.
Fairleigh Dickinson-Florham
Men • MAC • D3
Your Team Fit
415
Recruit median
380
In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.
Skidmore College
Men • Liberty League • D3
Your Team Fit
520
Recruit median
460
Above this program's typical recruit median — you're a top-of-class addition.
University of Scranton
Men • Landmark • D3
Your Team Fit
552
Recruit median
450
Above this program's typical recruit median — you're a top-of-class addition.
Selection: Realistic-tier first (sorted by Team Fit), padded with closest Reach or Stretch only if fewer than 5 Realistic matches exist. Display order: D1 → D2 → D3 within the picks. How is this calculated?
Custom college fit
Pick a specific school to see the full per-event analysis.
682 programs catalogued across NCAA D1, D2, and D3. Roughly half have real scraped rosters; the rest run on calibrated placeholder data while the T-166 cleanup expands coverage.