Swimmer profile
Vitto Ream
Female15-16Kona Aquatics Club, Inc.HI · WESTERN
SR Rating
NCAA D1 cut anchored • 2026 seasonBased on current PBs vs. NCAA D1 cut times.
- #1200 Back SCY2:28.85459
- #2100 Back SCY1:10.57415
- #3100 Free SCY1:05.34412
- #4200 IM SCY2:38.83409
Trajectory projected to end of high-school junior year — recruiting peak.
- #1200 Back SCY2:24.42502
- #2100 Back SCY1:09.44436
- #3100 Free SCY1:04.36431
- #4200 IM SCY2:36.26429
College junior year. Range reflects developmental uncertainty — wider for younger swimmers and late developers.
- #1200 Back SCY2:12.72647
- #2200 Breast SCY2:55.78417
- #3100 Back SCY1:10.57415
- #4100 Free SCY1:05.34412
Refine your College CeilingTesting
Tell us about your swimmer’s growth. We use trajectory data by default; your input fine-tunes the ceiling range. Not saved — refresh resets to default.
What this means for Vitto
Building toward recruiting peak — currently Building Base.
Recruiting conversations start in earnest at the end of sophomore year (NCAA contact rules let coaches reach out June 15 of sophomore year for most sports including swimming). Your projected rating (461 → Building Base) is the more meaningful number for that window. Continue building broad event coverage — the top-4 weighting rewards multiple strong events.
Maturity context: Your data shows late-developer trajectory — continued steep improvement past age 15. That's exactly the kind of pattern that under-rates well-developed seniors but signals strong upside.
What time drops unlock D2/D3 Realistic
Each row shows the time required in that event alone to push SR Rating Current from 431 to 600, holding the other three events fixed. Only physiologically reachable drops (≤15% per event) are shown. In practice swimmers improve across multiple events at once, so real progress will lift faster than these single-event deltas suggest.
No single-event drop within reachable bounds gets 431 all the way to 600. The gap from Building Base to D2/D3 Realistic closes through broad improvement — multiple events moving together. That’s exactly what college coaches want to see; specialists rarely make this jump on one event alone.
Best school matches
Top 5 of 141 curated programs that actually fit. Use the picker below to evaluate any other school.
Loras College
Women • ARC • D3
Your Team Fit
459
Recruit median
420
In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.
Luther College
Women • ARC • D3
Your Team Fit
459
Recruit median
430
In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.
McDaniel College
Women • Centennial • D3
Your Team Fit
459
Recruit median
430
In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.
Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology
Women • HCAC • D3
Your Team Fit
459
Recruit median
430
In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.
Clarkson University
Women • Liberty League • D3
Your Team Fit
459
Recruit median
440
In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.
Selection: Realistic-tier first (sorted by Team Fit), padded with closest Reach or Stretch only if fewer than 5 Realistic matches exist. Display order: D1 → D2 → D3 within the picks. How is this calculated?
Custom college fit
Pick a specific school to see the full per-event analysis.
682 programs catalogued across NCAA D1, D2, and D3. Roughly half have real scraped rosters; the rest run on calibrated placeholder data while the T-166 cleanup expands coverage.