Swimmer profile
Sasha Morozova
Female15-16California Capital AquaticsSN · WESTERN
SR Rating
NCAA D1 cut anchored • 2026 seasonBased on current PBs vs. NCAA D1 cut times.
- #150 Free SCY27.19550
- #2100 Free SCY1:00.92508
- #3100 Breast SCY1:16.54489
- #4200 Breast SCY2:47.75479
Trajectory projected to end of high-school junior year — recruiting peak.
- #1100 Breast SCY1:08.91670
- #250 Free SCY25.99630
- #3100 Fly SCY1:02.26600
- #4400 IM SCY5:01.05595
College junior year. Range reflects developmental uncertainty — wider for younger swimmers and late developers.
- #1100 Fly SCY51.561057
- #2100 Breast SCY59.491041
- #3400 IM SCY4:23.61886
- #4200 Breast SCY2:21.50798
Refine your College CeilingTesting
Tell us about your swimmer’s growth. We use trajectory data by default; your input fine-tunes the ceiling range. Not saved — refresh resets to default.
What this means for Sasha
Building toward recruiting peak — currently Building Base.
Recruiting conversations start in earnest at the end of sophomore year (NCAA contact rules let coaches reach out June 15 of sophomore year for most sports including swimming). Your projected rating (639 → D2/D3 Realistic) is the more meaningful number for that window. Continue building broad event coverage — the top-4 weighting rewards multiple strong events.
Maturity context: Your data shows late-developer trajectory — continued steep improvement past age 15. That's exactly the kind of pattern that under-rates well-developed seniors but signals strong upside.
What time drops unlock D2/D3 Realistic
Each row shows the time required in that event alone to push SR Rating Current from 520 to 600, holding the other three events fixed. Only physiologically reachable drops (≤15% per event) are shown. In practice swimmers improve across multiple events at once, so real progress will lift faster than these single-event deltas suggest.
| Event | Current | Target | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| 50 Free SCY | 27.19 | 24.45 | −2.74s |
| 100 Free SCY | 1:00.92 | 54.38 | −6.54s |
Best school matches
Top 5 of 167 curated programs that actually fit. Use the picker below to evaluate any other school.
Franklin & Marshall College
Women • Centennial • D3
Your Team Fit
580
Recruit median
560
In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
Women • Liberty League • D3
Your Team Fit
517
Recruit median
480
In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.
Skidmore College
Women • Liberty League • D3
Your Team Fit
569
Recruit median
470
Above this program's typical recruit median — you're a top-of-class addition.
Swarthmore College
Women • Centennial • D3
Your Team Fit
755
Recruit median
540
Above this program's typical recruit median — you're a top-of-class addition.
Hartwick College
Women • Empire 8 • D3
Your Team Fit
619
Recruit median
380
Above this program's typical recruit median — you're a top-of-class addition.
Selection: Realistic-tier first (sorted by Team Fit), padded with closest Reach or Stretch only if fewer than 5 Realistic matches exist. Display order: D1 → D2 → D3 within the picks. How is this calculated?
Custom college fit
Pick a specific school to see the full per-event analysis.
682 programs catalogued across NCAA D1, D2, and D3. Roughly half have real scraped rosters; the rest run on calibrated placeholder data while the T-166 cleanup expands coverage.