Swimmer profile

Emilio Pinto

Male15-16APEX AQUATICSOR · WESTERN

SR Rating

NCAA D1 cut anchored • 2026 season
Late developerage 16
Current (today)
591
Building Base

Based on current PBs vs. NCAA D1 cut times.

  • #1400 IM SCY4:29.12594
  • #2200 IM SCY2:04.01592
  • #3100 Breast SCY1:02.76588
  • #4100 Fly SCY55.62570
Projected (age 17)
705
D2/D3 Realistic

Trajectory projected to end of high-school junior year — recruiting peak.

  • #1100 Fly SCY51.56715
  • #2200 Fly SCY1:56.20713
  • #3100 Breast SCY59.58687
  • #4200 Breast SCY2:13.63637
College Ceiling (age 21)
1135range 5911160
Blue Chip

College junior year. Range reflects developmental uncertainty — wider for younger swimmers and late developers.

  • #1100 Fly SCYCONF43.801167
  • #2200 Fly SCYCONF1:38.601166
  • #3100 Breast SCY51.531062
  • #4200 Breast SCY1:58.51913
Coach viewPIe ≈ 50(3156)typical outcome D3 (89%)
Why the College Ceiling lineup differs: 200 Fly SCY, 200 Breast SCY are improving fastest vs. the NCAA D1 cut, so they rank into the top 4 at age 21 even though they aren't in today’s top 4. That’s a real recruiting signal — shows which events project as the strongest college pathway.

Refine your College CeilingTesting

Tell us about your swimmer’s growth. We use trajectory data by default; your input fine-tunes the ceiling range. Not saved — refresh resets to default.

What this means for Emilio

Building toward recruiting peak — currently Building Base.

Recruiting conversations start in earnest at the end of sophomore year (NCAA contact rules let coaches reach out June 15 of sophomore year for most sports including swimming). Your projected rating (705 → D2/D3 Realistic) is the more meaningful number for that window. Continue building broad event coverage — the top-4 weighting rewards multiple strong events.

Maturity context: Your data shows late-developer trajectory — continued steep improvement past age 15. That's exactly the kind of pattern that under-rates well-developed seniors but signals strong upside.

What time drops unlock D2/D3 Realistic

Each row shows the time required in that event alone to push SR Rating Current from 591 to 600, holding the other three events fixed. Only physiologically reachable drops (≤15% per event) are shown. In practice swimmers improve across multiple events at once, so real progress will lift faster than these single-event deltas suggest.

EventCurrentTargetΔ
400 IM SCY4:29.124:25.62−3.50s
200 IM SCY2:04.012:02.39−1.62s
100 Breast SCY1:02.761:00.82−1.94s
100 Fly SCY55.6251.34−4.28s

Best school matches

Top 5 of 130 curated programs that actually fit. Use the picker below to evaluate any other school.

Pilot data

Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology

MenHCACD3

Match

Your Team Fit

424

Recruit median

420

In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.

Transylvania University

MenHCACD3

Match

Your Team Fit

419

Recruit median

400

In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.

Augustana College (IL)

MenCCIWD3

Safety

Your Team Fit

490

Recruit median

410

Above this program's typical recruit median — you're a top-of-class addition.

Franklin & Marshall College

MenCentennialD3

Safety

Your Team Fit

728

Recruit median

550

Above this program's typical recruit median — you're a top-of-class addition.

Carthage College

MenCCIWD3

Safety

Your Team Fit

605

Recruit median

420

Above this program's typical recruit median — you're a top-of-class addition.

Selection: Realistic-tier first (sorted by Team Fit), padded with closest Reach or Stretch only if fewer than 5 Realistic matches exist. Display order: D1 → D2 → D3 within the picks. How is this calculated?

Custom college fit

Pick a specific school to see the full per-event analysis.

682 programs catalogued across NCAA D1, D2, and D3. Roughly half have real scraped rosters; the rest run on calibrated placeholder data while the T-166 cleanup expands coverage.