Swimmer profile

Charlotte Pannel

Female13-14Shock WaveMS · SOUTHERN

SR Rating

NCAA D1 cut anchored • 2026 season
age 13
Current (today)
480
Building Base

Based on current PBs vs. NCAA D1 cut times.

  • #150 Free SCY28.14496
  • #2200 Free SCY2:14.67481
  • #3100 Free SCY1:03.14456
  • #4500 Free SCY6:15.86430
Projected (age 17)
981
D1 Power 4

Trajectory projected to end of high-school junior year — recruiting peak.

  • #1100 Free SCYCONF46.851116
  • #2100 Back SCY53.25967
  • #350 Free SCY24.28773
  • #4500 Free SCY5:11.28757
College Ceiling (age 21)
1068range 4801159
D1 Power 4Blue Chip

College junior year. Range reflects developmental uncertainty — wider for younger swimmers and late developers.

  • #1100 Free SCYCONF46.171166
  • #2100 Back SCY51.341079
  • #350 Free SCY23.23882
  • #4200 Free SCY1:51.37851
Coach viewPIe ≈ 73(5283)typical outcome D3 (90%)
Why the College Ceiling lineup differs: 100 Back SCY is improving fastest vs. the NCAA D1 cut, so it ranks into the top 4 at age 21 even though it isn't in today’s top 4. That’s a real recruiting signal — shows which event projects as the strongest college pathway.

Refine your College CeilingTesting

Tell us about your swimmer’s growth. We use trajectory data by default; your input fine-tunes the ceiling range. Not saved — refresh resets to default.

What this means for Charlotte

Foundation years. Focus on broad event development.

Your swimmer's Current rating is 480 (Building Base). College coaches don't look at age-13 times — they look at junior-year times. Track the Projected number; that's what coaches will see when they evaluate in 2-3 years.

What time drops unlock D2/D3 Realistic

Each row shows the time required in that event alone to push SR Rating Current from 480 to 600, holding the other three events fixed. Only physiologically reachable drops (≤15% per event) are shown. In practice swimmers improve across multiple events at once, so real progress will lift faster than these single-event deltas suggest.

EventCurrentTargetΔ
50 Free SCY28.1423.96−4.18s

Best school matches

Top 5 of 169 curated programs that actually fit. Use the picker below to evaluate any other school.

Pilot data

Carson-Newman University

WomenSACD2

Match

Your Team Fit

949

Recruit median

870

In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.

Northern Michigan University

WomenGLIACD2

Match

Your Team Fit

949

Recruit median

890

In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.

Missouri University of Science and Tech

WomenGLVCD2

Match

Your Team Fit

949

Recruit median

880

In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.

Truman State University

WomenGLVCD2

Match

Your Team Fit

949

Recruit median

920

In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.

Ashland University

WomenGMACD2

Match

Your Team Fit

949

Recruit median

940

In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.

Selection: Realistic-tier first (sorted by Team Fit), padded with closest Reach or Stretch only if fewer than 5 Realistic matches exist. Display order: D1 → D2 → D3 within the picks. How is this calculated?

Custom college fit

Pick a specific school to see the full per-event analysis.

682 programs catalogued across NCAA D1, D2, and D3. Roughly half have real scraped rosters; the rest run on calibrated placeholder data while the T-166 cleanup expands coverage.