Swimmer profile
Caitlyn Morris
Female15-16Grand Rapids AquaticsMI · CENTRAL
SR Rating
NCAA D1 cut anchored • 2026 seasonBased on current PBs vs. NCAA D1 cut times.
- #1100 Free SCY55.64666
- #250 Free SCY25.53665
- #3100 Back SCY1:01.40631
- #4200 Free SCY2:05.76591
Trajectory projected to end of high-school junior year — recruiting peak.
- #1100 Free SCY47.411077
- #250 Free SCY21.751075
- #3100 Back SCY52.321019
- #4200 Back SCY1:57.97922
College junior year. Range reflects developmental uncertainty — wider for younger swimmers and late developers.
- #1200 Free SCYCONF1:40.251167
- #2200 Back SCYCONF1:49.061166
- #3100 Free SCYCONF46.171166
- #4100 Back SCYCONF50.021166
Refine your College CeilingTesting
Tell us about your swimmer’s growth. We use trajectory data by default; your input fine-tunes the ceiling range. Not saved — refresh resets to default.
What this means for Caitlyn
Building toward recruiting peak — currently D2/D3 Realistic.
Recruiting conversations start in earnest at the end of sophomore year (NCAA contact rules let coaches reach out June 15 of sophomore year for most sports including swimming). Your projected rating (1058 → D1 Power 4) is the more meaningful number for that window. Continue building broad event coverage — the top-4 weighting rewards multiple strong events.
Maturity context: Your data shows late-developer trajectory — continued steep improvement past age 15. That's exactly the kind of pattern that under-rates well-developed seniors but signals strong upside.
What time drops unlock D1 Mid-Major
Each row shows the time required in that event alone to push SR Rating Current from 655 to 750, holding the other three events fixed. Only physiologically reachable drops (≤15% per event) are shown. In practice swimmers improve across multiple events at once, so real progress will lift faster than these single-event deltas suggest.
| Event | Current | Target | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| 100 Free SCY | 55.64 | 50.17 | −5.47s |
| 50 Free SCY | 25.53 | 23.02 | −2.51s |
Best school matches
Top 5 of 169 curated programs that actually fit. Use the picker below to evaluate any other school.
Henderson State University
Women • GAC • D2
Your Team Fit
904
Recruit median
830
In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.
Michigan Technological University
Women • GLIAC • D2
Your Team Fit
904
Recruit median
850
In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.
Missouri University of Science and Tech
Women • GLVC • D2
Your Team Fit
904
Recruit median
880
In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.
Assumption University
Women • NE-10 • D2
Your Team Fit
904
Recruit median
830
In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.
Carson-Newman University
Women • SAC • D2
Your Team Fit
904
Recruit median
870
In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.
Selection: Realistic-tier first (sorted by Team Fit), padded with closest Reach or Stretch only if fewer than 5 Realistic matches exist. Display order: D1 → D2 → D3 within the picks. How is this calculated?
Custom college fit
Pick a specific school to see the full per-event analysis.
682 programs catalogued across NCAA D1, D2, and D3. Roughly half have real scraped rosters; the rest run on calibrated placeholder data while the T-166 cleanup expands coverage.