Swimmer profile
Renata Ochoa
Female15-16Bison Aquatic ClubOK · CENTRAL
SR Rating
NCAA D1 cut anchored • 2026 seasonBased on current PBs vs. NCAA D1 cut times.
- #150 Free SCY28.37484
- #2100 Free SCY1:02.97460
- #3100 Fly SCY1:08.85444
- #4200 Free SCY2:20.84421
Trajectory projected to end of high-school junior year — recruiting peak.
- #1100 Fly SCY1:00.85643
- #2100 Free SCY58.98560
- #350 Free SCY27.52531
- #4200 Free SCY2:16.45463
College junior year. Range reflects developmental uncertainty — wider for younger swimmers and late developers.
- #1100 Fly SCY51.181081
- #2100 Free SCY53.82736
- #350 Free SCY26.37603
- #4200 Free SCY2:10.53528
Refine your College CeilingTesting
Tell us about your swimmer’s growth. We use trajectory data by default; your input fine-tunes the ceiling range. Not saved — refresh resets to default.
What this means for Renata
Building toward recruiting peak — currently Building Base.
Recruiting conversations start in earnest at the end of sophomore year (NCAA contact rules let coaches reach out June 15 of sophomore year for most sports including swimming). Your projected rating (582 → Building Base) is the more meaningful number for that window. Continue building broad event coverage — the top-4 weighting rewards multiple strong events.
Maturity context: Your data shows late-developer trajectory — continued steep improvement past age 15. That's exactly the kind of pattern that under-rates well-developed seniors but signals strong upside.
What time drops unlock D2/D3 Realistic
Each row shows the time required in that event alone to push SR Rating Current from 464 to 600, holding the other three events fixed. Only physiologically reachable drops (≤15% per event) are shown. In practice swimmers improve across multiple events at once, so real progress will lift faster than these single-event deltas suggest.
No single-event drop within reachable bounds gets 464 all the way to 600. The gap from Building Base to D2/D3 Realistic closes through broad improvement — multiple events moving together. That’s exactly what college coaches want to see; specialists rarely make this jump on one event alone.
Best school matches
Top 5 of 161 curated programs that actually fit. Use the picker below to evaluate any other school.
Messiah University
Women • MAC • D3
Your Team Fit
490
Recruit median
470
In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.
Albion College
Women • MIAA • D3
Your Team Fit
433
Recruit median
430
In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.
Hartwick College
Women • Empire 8 • D3
Your Team Fit
399
Recruit median
380
In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.
Franklin College
Women • HCAC • D3
Your Team Fit
436
Recruit median
390
Above this program's typical recruit median — you're a top-of-class addition.
Bryn Mawr College
Women • Centennial • D3
Your Team Fit
463
Recruit median
410
Above this program's typical recruit median — you're a top-of-class addition.
Selection: Realistic-tier first (sorted by Team Fit), padded with closest Reach or Stretch only if fewer than 5 Realistic matches exist. Display order: D1 → D2 → D3 within the picks. How is this calculated?
Custom college fit
Pick a specific school to see the full per-event analysis.
682 programs catalogued across NCAA D1, D2, and D3. Roughly half have real scraped rosters; the rest run on calibrated placeholder data while the T-166 cleanup expands coverage.