Swimmer profile
Patricia O'Leary
Female15-16Fall River Swim TeamSD · CENTRAL
SR Rating
NCAA D1 cut anchored • 2026 seasonBased on current PBs vs. NCAA D1 cut times.
- #150 Free SCY29.32439
- #2100 Free SCY1:06.21396
- #3200 Free SCY2:29.36353
- #4500 Free SCY6:56.79315
Trajectory projected to end of high-school junior year — recruiting peak.
- #150 Free SCY25.04704
- #2100 Free SCY56.42639
- #3200 Free SCY2:07.27570
- #4500 Free SCY5:55.16510
College junior year. Range reflects developmental uncertainty — wider for younger swimmers and late developers.
- #150 Free SCYCONF21.171166
- #2100 Free SCYCONF46.351153
- #3200 Free SCY1:44.551028
- #4500 Free SCY4:51.75920
Refine your College CeilingTesting
Tell us about your swimmer’s growth. We use trajectory data by default; your input fine-tunes the ceiling range. Not saved — refresh resets to default.
What this means for Patricia
Building toward recruiting peak — currently Building Base.
Recruiting conversations start in earnest at the end of sophomore year (NCAA contact rules let coaches reach out June 15 of sophomore year for most sports including swimming). Your projected rating (646 → D2/D3 Realistic) is the more meaningful number for that window. Continue building broad event coverage — the top-4 weighting rewards multiple strong events.
Maturity context: Your data shows late-developer trajectory — continued steep improvement past age 15. That's exactly the kind of pattern that under-rates well-developed seniors but signals strong upside.
What time drops unlock D2/D3 Realistic
Each row shows the time required in that event alone to push SR Rating Current from 401 to 600, holding the other three events fixed. Only physiologically reachable drops (≤15% per event) are shown. In practice swimmers improve across multiple events at once, so real progress will lift faster than these single-event deltas suggest.
No single-event drop within reachable bounds gets 401 all the way to 600. The gap from Building Base to D2/D3 Realistic closes through broad improvement — multiple events moving together. That’s exactly what college coaches want to see; specialists rarely make this jump on one event alone.
Best school matches
Top 5 of 147 curated programs that actually fit. Use the picker below to evaluate any other school.
Swarthmore College
Women • Centennial • D3
Your Team Fit
578
Recruit median
540
In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.
Illinois Wesleyan University
Women • CCIW • D3
Your Team Fit
481
Recruit median
470
In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.
Alfred University
Women • Empire 8 • D3
Your Team Fit
465
Recruit median
400
Above this program's typical recruit median — you're a top-of-class addition.
Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology
Women • HCAC • D3
Your Team Fit
527
Recruit median
430
Above this program's typical recruit median — you're a top-of-class addition.
Susquehanna University
Women • MAC • D3
Your Team Fit
533
Recruit median
430
Above this program's typical recruit median — you're a top-of-class addition.
Selection: Realistic-tier first (sorted by Team Fit), padded with closest Reach or Stretch only if fewer than 5 Realistic matches exist. Display order: D1 → D2 → D3 within the picks. How is this calculated?
Custom college fit
Pick a specific school to see the full per-event analysis.
682 programs catalogued across NCAA D1, D2, and D3. Roughly half have real scraped rosters; the rest run on calibrated placeholder data while the T-166 cleanup expands coverage.