Swimmer profile
Helen Sadler
Female15-16Verona Area Swim TeamWI · CENTRAL
SR Rating
NCAA D1 cut anchored • 2026 seasonBased on current PBs vs. NCAA D1 cut times.
- #11650 Free SCY18:46.67669
- #2500 Free SCY5:25.07665
- #350 Free SCY25.75648
- #4100 Free SCY57.57602
Trajectory projected to end of high-school junior year — recruiting peak.
- #1100 Breast SCY1:05.55779
- #21650 Free SCY17:58.68762
- #350 Free SCY24.91716
- #4200 Breast SCY2:29.00684
College junior year. Range reflects developmental uncertainty — wider for younger swimmers and late developers.
- #1100 Breast SCYCONF57.291166
- #21650 Free SCY16:54.92915
- #3200 Breast SCY2:19.23838
- #450 Free SCY23.79821
Refine your College CeilingTesting
Tell us about your swimmer’s growth. We use trajectory data by default; your input fine-tunes the ceiling range. Not saved — refresh resets to default.
What this means for Helen
Building toward recruiting peak — currently D2/D3 Realistic.
Recruiting conversations start in earnest at the end of sophomore year (NCAA contact rules let coaches reach out June 15 of sophomore year for most sports including swimming). Your projected rating (756 → D1 Mid-Major) is the more meaningful number for that window. Continue building broad event coverage — the top-4 weighting rewards multiple strong events.
Maturity context: Your data shows late-developer trajectory — continued steep improvement past age 15. That's exactly the kind of pattern that under-rates well-developed seniors but signals strong upside.
What time drops unlock D1 Mid-Major
Each row shows the time required in that event alone to push SR Rating Current from 660 to 750, holding the other three events fixed. Only physiologically reachable drops (≤15% per event) are shown. In practice swimmers improve across multiple events at once, so real progress will lift faster than these single-event deltas suggest.
| Event | Current | Target | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1650 Free SCY | 18:46.67 | 17:00.49 | −106.18s |
| 500 Free SCY | 5:25.07 | 4:54.28 | −30.79s |
Best school matches
Top 5 of 169 curated programs that actually fit. Use the picker below to evaluate any other school.
Carson-Newman University
Women • SAC • D2
Your Team Fit
883
Recruit median
870
In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.
Harding University
Women • GAC • D2
Your Team Fit
883
Recruit median
810
In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.
Michigan Technological University
Women • GLIAC • D2
Your Team Fit
883
Recruit median
850
In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.
Maryville University
Women • GLVC • D2
Your Team Fit
883
Recruit median
820
In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.
Missouri University of Science and Tech
Women • GLVC • D2
Your Team Fit
883
Recruit median
880
In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.
Selection: Realistic-tier first (sorted by Team Fit), padded with closest Reach or Stretch only if fewer than 5 Realistic matches exist. Display order: D1 → D2 → D3 within the picks. How is this calculated?
Custom college fit
Pick a specific school to see the full per-event analysis.
682 programs catalogued across NCAA D1, D2, and D3. Roughly half have real scraped rosters; the rest run on calibrated placeholder data while the T-166 cleanup expands coverage.