Swimmer profile
Anya Pivonka
Female15-16Kansas City BlazersMV · CENTRAL
SR Rating
NCAA D1 cut anchored • 2026 seasonBased on current PBs vs. NCAA D1 cut times.
- #150 Free SCY23.99801
- #2100 Back SCY57.29776
- #3200 Back SCY2:07.28734
- #4200 Free SCY1:59.84683
Trajectory projected to end of high-school junior year — recruiting peak.
- #1100 Back SCYCONF50.021166
- #2200 Back SCY1:54.541007
- #350 Free SCY22.76938
- #4200 Free SCY1:51.98837
College junior year. Range reflects developmental uncertainty — wider for younger swimmers and late developers.
- #1200 Back SCYCONF1:49.061166
- #2100 Back SCYCONF50.021166
- #350 Free SCYCONF21.171166
- #4200 Free SCYCONF1:41.841113
Refine your College CeilingTesting
Tell us about your swimmer’s growth. We use trajectory data by default; your input fine-tunes the ceiling range. Not saved — refresh resets to default.
What this means for Anya
Building toward recruiting peak — currently D1 Mid-Major.
Recruiting conversations start in earnest at the end of sophomore year (NCAA contact rules let coaches reach out June 15 of sophomore year for most sports including swimming). Your projected rating (1048 → D1 Power 4) is the more meaningful number for that window. Continue building broad event coverage — the top-4 weighting rewards multiple strong events.
Maturity context: Your data shows late-developer trajectory — continued steep improvement past age 15. That's exactly the kind of pattern that under-rates well-developed seniors but signals strong upside.
What time drops unlock D1 Power 4
Each row shows the time required in that event alone to push SR Rating Current from 773 to 950, holding the other three events fixed. Only physiologically reachable drops (≤15% per event) are shown. In practice swimmers improve across multiple events at once, so real progress will lift faster than these single-event deltas suggest.
| Event | Current | Target | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| 50 Free SCY | 23.99 | 20.66 | −3.33s |
| 100 Back SCY | 57.29 | 49.16 | −8.13s |
Best school matches
Top 5 of 169 curated programs that actually fit. Use the picker below to evaluate any other school.
University of Mississippi
Women • SEC • D1
Your Team Fit
1012
Recruit median
940
In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.
Carson-Newman University
Women • SAC • D2
Your Team Fit
956
Recruit median
870
In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.
Northern Michigan University
Women • GLIAC • D2
Your Team Fit
956
Recruit median
890
In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.
McKendree University
Women • GLVC • D2
Your Team Fit
956
Recruit median
920
In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.
Missouri University of Science and Tech
Women • GLVC • D2
Your Team Fit
956
Recruit median
880
In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.
Selection: Realistic-tier first (sorted by Team Fit), padded with closest Reach or Stretch only if fewer than 5 Realistic matches exist. Display order: D1 → D2 → D3 within the picks. How is this calculated?
Custom college fit
Pick a specific school to see the full per-event analysis.
682 programs catalogued across NCAA D1, D2, and D3. Roughly half have real scraped rosters; the rest run on calibrated placeholder data while the T-166 cleanup expands coverage.