Swimmer profile
Morgan Etter
Female15-16Blue Tide AquaticsGU · SOUTHERN
SR Rating
NCAA D1 cut anchored • 2026 seasonBased on current PBs vs. NCAA D1 cut times.
- #1500 Free SCY5:07.14788
- #2100 Free SCY52.85778
- #3200 IM SCY2:09.25759
- #4200 Back SCY2:06.54747
Trajectory projected to end of high-school junior year — recruiting peak.
- #1200 Back SCY2:01.05853
- #2500 Free SCY5:01.55833
- #3100 Free SCY52.11811
- #4200 IM SCY2:06.97800
College junior year. Range reflects developmental uncertainty — wider for younger swimmers and late developers.
- #1200 Back SCYCONF1:49.061166
- #2100 Fly SCY52.191019
- #3200 Fly SCY1:57.96979
- #4500 Free SCY4:46.44972
Refine your College CeilingTesting
Tell us about your swimmer’s growth. We use trajectory data by default; your input fine-tunes the ceiling range. Not saved — refresh resets to default.
What this means for Morgan
Building toward recruiting peak — currently D1 Mid-Major.
Recruiting conversations start in earnest at the end of sophomore year (NCAA contact rules let coaches reach out June 15 of sophomore year for most sports including swimming). Your projected rating (835 → D1 Mid-Major) is the more meaningful number for that window. Continue building broad event coverage — the top-4 weighting rewards multiple strong events.
Maturity context: Your data shows late-developer trajectory — continued steep improvement past age 15. That's exactly the kind of pattern that under-rates well-developed seniors but signals strong upside.
What time drops unlock D1 Power 4
Each row shows the time required in that event alone to push SR Rating Current from 777 to 950, holding the other three events fixed. Only physiologically reachable drops (≤15% per event) are shown. In practice swimmers improve across multiple events at once, so real progress will lift faster than these single-event deltas suggest.
| Event | Current | Target | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| 500 Free SCY | 5:07.14 | 4:24.63 | −42.51s |
| 100 Free SCY | 52.85 | 45.46 | −7.39s |
Best school matches
Top 5 of 169 curated programs that actually fit. Use the picker below to evaluate any other school.
Carson-Newman University
Women • SAC • D2
Your Team Fit
896
Recruit median
870
In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.
Henderson State University
Women • GAC • D2
Your Team Fit
896
Recruit median
830
In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.
Michigan Technological University
Women • GLIAC • D2
Your Team Fit
896
Recruit median
850
In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.
Maryville University
Women • GLVC • D2
Your Team Fit
896
Recruit median
820
In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.
Missouri University of Science and Tech
Women • GLVC • D2
Your Team Fit
896
Recruit median
880
In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.
Selection: Realistic-tier first (sorted by Team Fit), padded with closest Reach or Stretch only if fewer than 5 Realistic matches exist. Display order: D1 → D2 → D3 within the picks. How is this calculated?
Custom college fit
Pick a specific school to see the full per-event analysis.
682 programs catalogued across NCAA D1, D2, and D3. Roughly half have real scraped rosters; the rest run on calibrated placeholder data while the T-166 cleanup expands coverage.