Swimmer profile
Emily Lam
Female17-18Lakeside Aquatic ClubNT · SOUTHERN
SR Rating
NCAA D1 cut anchored • 2026 seasonBased on current PBs vs. NCAA D1 cut times.
- #1200 Free SCY1:55.96754
- #250 Free SCY24.53749
- #3100 Free SCY53.54748
- #4500 Free SCY5:15.08730
You're at or past recruiting peak. SR Projected here equals SR Current — no forward projection is applied past age 17.
- #1200 Free SCY1:55.96754
- #250 Free SCY24.53749
- #3100 Free SCY53.54748
- #4500 Free SCY5:15.08730
College junior year. Range reflects developmental uncertainty — wider for younger swimmers and late developers.
- #1200 Free SCY1:48.89910
- #2100 Free SCY50.18909
- #350 Free SCY23.01908
- #4200 IM SCY2:03.50870
Refine your College CeilingTesting
Tell us about your swimmer’s growth. We use trajectory data by default; your input fine-tunes the ceiling range. Not saved — refresh resets to default.
What this means for Emily
D2/D3 Realistic recruit, peak window.
This is the recruiting window. Coaches are evaluating times within ~6 months of where you sit today. The College Ceiling range (750–995) shows the projected upside through college junior year — useful for "where will I be when it counts most" conversations.
Maturity context: Your late-developer trajectory matters here — make sure coaches understand you're still on the upslope. Bring growth-rate and recent improvement data to recruiting visits.
What time drops unlock D1 Mid-Major
Each row shows the time required in that event alone to push SR Rating Current from 750 to 750, holding the other three events fixed. Only physiologically reachable drops (≤15% per event) are shown. In practice swimmers improve across multiple events at once, so real progress will lift faster than these single-event deltas suggest.
| Event | Current | Target | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| 200 Free SCY | 1:55.96 | 1:55.91 | −0.05s |
| 50 Free SCY | 24.53 | 24.52 | −0.01s |
| 100 Free SCY | 53.54 | 53.49 | −0.05s |
| 500 Free SCY | 5:15.08 | 5:14.22 | −0.86s |
Best school matches
Top 5 of 169 curated programs that actually fit. Use the picker below to evaluate any other school.
Harding University
Women • GAC • D2
Your Team Fit
863
Recruit median
810
In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.
Michigan Technological University
Women • GLIAC • D2
Your Team Fit
863
Recruit median
850
In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.
Maryville University
Women • GLVC • D2
Your Team Fit
863
Recruit median
820
In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.
William Jewell College
Women • GLVC • D2
Your Team Fit
863
Recruit median
810
In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.
Assumption University
Women • NE-10 • D2
Your Team Fit
863
Recruit median
830
In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.
Selection: Realistic-tier first (sorted by Team Fit), padded with closest Reach or Stretch only if fewer than 5 Realistic matches exist. Display order: D1 → D2 → D3 within the picks. How is this calculated?
Custom college fit
Pick a specific school to see the full per-event analysis.
682 programs catalogued across NCAA D1, D2, and D3. Roughly half have real scraped rosters; the rest run on calibrated placeholder data while the T-166 cleanup expands coverage.