Swimmer profile

Lo Hammond

Female15-16Shoals Aquatic ClubSE · SOUTHERN

SR Rating

NCAA D1 cut anchored • 2026 season
age 15
Current (today)
715
D2/D3 Realistic

Based on current PBs vs. NCAA D1 cut times.

  • #150 Free SCY24.82723
  • #2500 Free SCY5:17.32715
  • #3200 Free SCY1:58.75702
  • #4100 Free SCY54.69702
Projected (age 17)
805
D1 Mid-Major

Trajectory projected to end of high-school junior year — recruiting peak.

  • #1100 Free SCY51.38846
  • #250 Free SCY24.00800
  • #3500 Free SCY5:12.80746
  • #4400 IM SCY4:41.17730
College Ceiling (age 21)
865range 7151010
D1 Mid-MajorD1 Power 4

College junior year. Range reflects developmental uncertainty — wider for younger swimmers and late developers.

  • #1100 Free SCY49.49947
  • #250 Free SCY23.52850
  • #3500 Free SCY5:10.13766
  • #4200 Free SCY1:58.75702
Coach viewPIe ≈ 26(2229)typical outcome D3 (69%)

Refine your College CeilingTesting

Tell us about your swimmer’s growth. We use trajectory data by default; your input fine-tunes the ceiling range. Not saved — refresh resets to default.

What this means for Lo

Building toward recruiting peak — currently D2/D3 Realistic.

Recruiting conversations start in earnest at the end of sophomore year (NCAA contact rules let coaches reach out June 15 of sophomore year for most sports including swimming). Your projected rating (805 → D1 Mid-Major) is the more meaningful number for that window. Continue building broad event coverage — the top-4 weighting rewards multiple strong events.

What time drops unlock D1 Mid-Major

Each row shows the time required in that event alone to push SR Rating Current from 715 to 750, holding the other three events fixed. Only physiologically reachable drops (≤15% per event) are shown. In practice swimmers improve across multiple events at once, so real progress will lift faster than these single-event deltas suggest.

EventCurrentTargetΔ
50 Free SCY24.8223.88−0.94s
500 Free SCY5:17.325:05.12−12.20s
200 Free SCY1:58.751:48.53−10.22s

Best school matches

Top 5 of 169 curated programs that actually fit. Use the picker below to evaluate any other school.

Pilot data

Carson-Newman University

WomenSACD2

Match

Your Team Fit

904

Recruit median

870

In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.

Michigan Technological University

WomenGLIACD2

Match

Your Team Fit

904

Recruit median

850

In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.

Henderson State University

WomenGACD2

Match

Your Team Fit

904

Recruit median

830

In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.

Missouri University of Science and Tech

WomenGLVCD2

Match

Your Team Fit

904

Recruit median

880

In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.

Assumption University

WomenNE-10D2

Match

Your Team Fit

904

Recruit median

830

In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.

Selection: Realistic-tier first (sorted by Team Fit), padded with closest Reach or Stretch only if fewer than 5 Realistic matches exist. Display order: D1 → D2 → D3 within the picks. How is this calculated?

Custom college fit

Pick a specific school to see the full per-event analysis.

682 programs catalogued across NCAA D1, D2, and D3. Roughly half have real scraped rosters; the rest run on calibrated placeholder data while the T-166 cleanup expands coverage.