Swimmer profile
Austin Chu
Male15-16CSP TideridersOZ · CENTRAL
SR Rating
NCAA D1 cut anchored • 2026 seasonBased on current PBs vs. NCAA D1 cut times.
- #1200 Back SCY1:44.47935
- #2100 Back SCY47.77910
- #3200 IM SCY1:50.79830
- #4100 Fly SCY49.75796
Trajectory projected to end of high-school junior year — recruiting peak.
- #1200 Back SCY1:42.25997
- #2100 Back SCY46.61980
- #3200 Fly SCY1:46.77919
- #4200 IM SCY1:48.72879
College junior year. Range reflects developmental uncertainty — wider for younger swimmers and late developers.
- #1200 Back SCYCONF1:37.031167
- #2200 Fly SCYCONF1:38.601166
- #3100 Back SCYCONF43.981166
- #4100 Breast SCYCONF50.261145
Refine your College CeilingTesting
Tell us about your swimmer’s growth. We use trajectory data by default; your input fine-tunes the ceiling range. Not saved — refresh resets to default.
What this means for Austin
Building toward recruiting peak — currently D1 Mid-Major.
Recruiting conversations start in earnest at the end of sophomore year (NCAA contact rules let coaches reach out June 15 of sophomore year for most sports including swimming). Your projected rating (970 → D1 Power 4) is the more meaningful number for that window. Continue building broad event coverage — the top-4 weighting rewards multiple strong events.
Maturity context: Your data shows late-developer trajectory — continued steep improvement past age 15. That's exactly the kind of pattern that under-rates well-developed seniors but signals strong upside.
What time drops unlock D1 Power 4
Each row shows the time required in that event alone to push SR Rating Current from 900 to 950, holding the other three events fixed. Only physiologically reachable drops (≤15% per event) are shown. In practice swimmers improve across multiple events at once, so real progress will lift faster than these single-event deltas suggest.
| Event | Current | Target | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| 200 Back SCY | 1:44.47 | 1:40.08 | −4.39s |
| 100 Back SCY | 47.77 | 45.71 | −2.06s |
| 200 IM SCY | 1:50.79 | 1:39.59 | −11.20s |
Best school matches
Top 5 of 133 curated programs that actually fit. Use the picker below to evaluate any other school.
University of Arizona
Men • Big 12 • D1
Your Team Fit
1132
Recruit median
1070
In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.
University of Alabama
Men • SEC • D1
Your Team Fit
1132
Recruit median
1090
In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.
University of Kentucky
Men • SEC • D1
Your Team Fit
1132
Recruit median
1030
In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.
University of Louisville
Men • ACC • D1
Your Team Fit
1132
Recruit median
1120
In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.
University of Missouri
Men • SEC • D1
Your Team Fit
1132
Recruit median
1050
In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.
Selection: Realistic-tier first (sorted by Team Fit), padded with closest Reach or Stretch only if fewer than 5 Realistic matches exist. Display order: D1 → D2 → D3 within the picks. How is this calculated?
Custom college fit
Pick a specific school to see the full per-event analysis.
682 programs catalogued across NCAA D1, D2, and D3. Roughly half have real scraped rosters; the rest run on calibrated placeholder data while the T-166 cleanup expands coverage.