Swimmer profile
Lainey Hooff
Female15-16Arlington Aquatic ClubPV · EASTERN
SR Rating
NCAA D1 cut anchored • 2026 seasonBased on current PBs vs. NCAA D1 cut times.
- #11650 Free SCY17:40.25803
- #2500 Free SCY5:06.54793
- #3200 Free SCY1:54.77777
- #4100 Free SCY53.54748
Trajectory projected to end of high-school junior year — recruiting peak.
- #1500 Free SCY4:57.48867
- #2200 Free SCY1:52.27831
- #31650 Free SCY17:33.51818
- #4400 IM SCY4:30.82817
College junior year. Range reflects developmental uncertainty — wider for younger swimmers and late developers.
- #1400 IM SCYCONF4:00.541166
- #2500 Free SCYCONF4:33.521116
- #3100 Fly SCY52.051027
- #4200 Free SCY1:45.56999
Refine your College CeilingTesting
Tell us about your swimmer’s growth. We use trajectory data by default; your input fine-tunes the ceiling range. Not saved — refresh resets to default.
What this means for Lainey
Building toward recruiting peak — currently D1 Mid-Major.
Recruiting conversations start in earnest at the end of sophomore year (NCAA contact rules let coaches reach out June 15 of sophomore year for most sports including swimming). Your projected rating (842 → D1 Mid-Major) is the more meaningful number for that window. Continue building broad event coverage — the top-4 weighting rewards multiple strong events.
Maturity context: Your data shows late-developer trajectory — continued steep improvement past age 15. That's exactly the kind of pattern that under-rates well-developed seniors but signals strong upside.
What time drops unlock D1 Power 4
Each row shows the time required in that event alone to push SR Rating Current from 791 to 950, holding the other three events fixed. Only physiologically reachable drops (≤15% per event) are shown. In practice swimmers improve across multiple events at once, so real progress will lift faster than these single-event deltas suggest.
| Event | Current | Target | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1650 Free SCY | 17:40.25 | 15:24.84 | −135.41s |
| 500 Free SCY | 5:06.54 | 4:27.02 | −39.52s |
Best school matches
Top 5 of 169 curated programs that actually fit. Use the picker below to evaluate any other school.
Carson-Newman University
Women • SAC • D2
Your Team Fit
899
Recruit median
870
In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.
Michigan Technological University
Women • GLIAC • D2
Your Team Fit
899
Recruit median
850
In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.
Northern Michigan University
Women • GLIAC • D2
Your Team Fit
899
Recruit median
890
In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.
Maryville University
Women • GLVC • D2
Your Team Fit
899
Recruit median
820
In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.
Missouri University of Science and Tech
Women • GLVC • D2
Your Team Fit
899
Recruit median
880
In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.
Selection: Realistic-tier first (sorted by Team Fit), padded with closest Reach or Stretch only if fewer than 5 Realistic matches exist. Display order: D1 → D2 → D3 within the picks. How is this calculated?
Custom college fit
Pick a specific school to see the full per-event analysis.
682 programs catalogued across NCAA D1, D2, and D3. Roughly half have real scraped rosters; the rest run on calibrated placeholder data while the T-166 cleanup expands coverage.