Swimmer profile
Anna Kate Barr
Female17-18Team GreenvilleSC · SOUTHERN
SR Rating
NCAA D1 cut anchored • 2026 seasonBased on current PBs vs. NCAA D1 cut times.
- #1400 IM SCY4:26.27860
- #2200 Fly SCY2:06.15800
- #3200 IM SCY2:08.50772
- #4200 Breast SCY2:23.71762
You're at or past recruiting peak. SR Projected here equals SR Current — no forward projection is applied past age 17.
- #1400 IM SCY4:26.27860
- #2200 Fly SCY2:06.15800
- #3200 IM SCY2:08.50772
- #4200 Breast SCY2:23.71762
College junior year. Range reflects developmental uncertainty — wider for younger swimmers and late developers.
- #1200 Fly SCY1:58.29970
- #2400 IM SCY4:16.22965
- #3200 Breast SCY2:13.07960
- #4200 IM SCY2:02.47892
Refine your College CeilingTesting
Tell us about your swimmer’s growth. We use trajectory data by default; your input fine-tunes the ceiling range. Not saved — refresh resets to default.
What this means for Anna
D1 Mid-Major recruit, peak window.
This is the recruiting window. Coaches are evaluating times within ~6 months of where you sit today. The College Ceiling range (817–1044) shows the projected upside through college junior year — useful for "where will I be when it counts most" conversations.
Maturity context: Your late-developer trajectory matters here — make sure coaches understand you're still on the upslope. Bring growth-rate and recent improvement data to recruiting visits.
What time drops unlock D1 Power 4
Each row shows the time required in that event alone to push SR Rating Current from 817 to 950, holding the other three events fixed. Only physiologically reachable drops (≤15% per event) are shown. In practice swimmers improve across multiple events at once, so real progress will lift faster than these single-event deltas suggest.
| Event | Current | Target | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| 400 IM SCY | 4:26.27 | 3:58.15 | −28.12s |
| 200 Fly SCY | 2:06.15 | 1:52.04 | −14.11s |
Best school matches
Top 5 of 169 curated programs that actually fit. Use the picker below to evaluate any other school.
Henderson State University
Women • GAC • D2
Your Team Fit
902
Recruit median
830
In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.
Michigan Technological University
Women • GLIAC • D2
Your Team Fit
902
Recruit median
850
In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.
Northern Michigan University
Women • GLIAC • D2
Your Team Fit
902
Recruit median
890
In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.
Maryville University
Women • GLVC • D2
Your Team Fit
902
Recruit median
820
In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.
Missouri University of Science and Tech
Women • GLVC • D2
Your Team Fit
902
Recruit median
880
In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.
Selection: Realistic-tier first (sorted by Team Fit), padded with closest Reach or Stretch only if fewer than 5 Realistic matches exist. Display order: D1 → D2 → D3 within the picks. How is this calculated?
Custom college fit
Pick a specific school to see the full per-event analysis.
682 programs catalogued across NCAA D1, D2, and D3. Roughly half have real scraped rosters; the rest run on calibrated placeholder data while the T-166 cleanup expands coverage.