Swimmer profile
Lida Prochaska
Female15-16Nebraska AquaticsMW · CENTRAL
SR Rating
NCAA D1 cut anchored • 2026 seasonBased on current PBs vs. NCAA D1 cut times.
- #1100 Free SCY58.81564
- #2200 Free SCY2:09.73538
- #350 Free SCY27.52531
- #4100 Breast SCY1:19.74432
Trajectory projected to end of high-school junior year — recruiting peak.
- #1100 Free SCY55.11686
- #2200 Free SCY2:00.04679
- #350 Free SCY25.58661
- #4100 Breast SCY1:13.70548
College junior year. Range reflects developmental uncertainty — wider for younger swimmers and late developers.
- #1200 Free SCYCONF1:40.251167
- #2100 Free SCYCONF46.171166
- #350 Free SCYCONF21.171166
- #4100 Breast SCY59.131061
Refine your College CeilingTesting
Tell us about your swimmer’s growth. We use trajectory data by default; your input fine-tunes the ceiling range. Not saved — refresh resets to default.
What this means for Lida
Building toward recruiting peak — currently Building Base.
Recruiting conversations start in earnest at the end of sophomore year (NCAA contact rules let coaches reach out June 15 of sophomore year for most sports including swimming). Your projected rating (671 → D2/D3 Realistic) is the more meaningful number for that window. Continue building broad event coverage — the top-4 weighting rewards multiple strong events.
Maturity context: Your data shows late-developer trajectory — continued steep improvement past age 15. That's exactly the kind of pattern that under-rates well-developed seniors but signals strong upside.
What time drops unlock D2/D3 Realistic
Each row shows the time required in that event alone to push SR Rating Current from 541 to 600, holding the other three events fixed. Only physiologically reachable drops (≤15% per event) are shown. In practice swimmers improve across multiple events at once, so real progress will lift faster than these single-event deltas suggest.
| Event | Current | Target | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| 100 Free SCY | 58.81 | 54.33 | −4.48s |
| 200 Free SCY | 2:09.73 | 1:59.43 | −10.30s |
Best school matches
Top 5 of 151 curated programs that actually fit. Use the picker below to evaluate any other school.
Swarthmore College
Women • Centennial • D3
Your Team Fit
555
Recruit median
540
In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.
University of Scranton
Women • Landmark • D3
Your Team Fit
477
Recruit median
460
In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.
Marywood University
Women • CSAC • D3
Your Team Fit
408
Recruit median
380
In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.
Alfred University
Women • Empire 8 • D3
Your Team Fit
408
Recruit median
400
In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.
Anderson University (IN)
Women • HCAC • D3
Your Team Fit
400
Recruit median
380
In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.
Selection: Realistic-tier first (sorted by Team Fit), padded with closest Reach or Stretch only if fewer than 5 Realistic matches exist. Display order: D1 → D2 → D3 within the picks. How is this calculated?
Custom college fit
Pick a specific school to see the full per-event analysis.
682 programs catalogued across NCAA D1, D2, and D3. Roughly half have real scraped rosters; the rest run on calibrated placeholder data while the T-166 cleanup expands coverage.