Swimmer profile
Emma Proffitt
Female15-16King Marlin Swim ClubOK · CENTRAL
SR Rating
NCAA D1 cut anchored • 2026 seasonBased on current PBs vs. NCAA D1 cut times.
- #150 Free SCY27.24547
- #2200 Free SCY2:10.64527
- #3500 Free SCY5:57.68499
- #4100 Free SCY1:02.42472
Trajectory projected to end of high-school junior year — recruiting peak.
- #1200 Free SCY2:06.55580
- #250 Free SCY27.24547
- #3500 Free SCY5:57.68499
- #4200 IM SCY2:28.81497
College junior year. Range reflects developmental uncertainty — wider for younger swimmers and late developers.
- #1200 Free SCY1:55.77757
- #2200 IM SCY2:15.27662
- #350 Free SCY27.24547
- #4500 Free SCY5:57.68499
Refine your College CeilingTesting
Tell us about your swimmer’s growth. We use trajectory data by default; your input fine-tunes the ceiling range. Not saved — refresh resets to default.
What this means for Emma
Building toward recruiting peak — currently Building Base.
Recruiting conversations start in earnest at the end of sophomore year (NCAA contact rules let coaches reach out June 15 of sophomore year for most sports including swimming). Your projected rating (549 → Building Base) is the more meaningful number for that window. Continue building broad event coverage — the top-4 weighting rewards multiple strong events.
Maturity context: Your data shows late-developer trajectory — continued steep improvement past age 15. That's exactly the kind of pattern that under-rates well-developed seniors but signals strong upside.
What time drops unlock D2/D3 Realistic
Each row shows the time required in that event alone to push SR Rating Current from 527 to 600, holding the other three events fixed. Only physiologically reachable drops (≤15% per event) are shown. In practice swimmers improve across multiple events at once, so real progress will lift faster than these single-event deltas suggest.
| Event | Current | Target | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| 50 Free SCY | 27.24 | 24.70 | −2.54s |
| 200 Free SCY | 2:10.64 | 1:58.07 | −12.57s |
Best school matches
Top 5 of 152 curated programs that actually fit. Use the picker below to evaluate any other school.
Swarthmore College
Women • Centennial • D3
Your Team Fit
594
Recruit median
540
In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.
University of Scranton
Women • Landmark • D3
Your Team Fit
500
Recruit median
460
In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.
Susquehanna University
Women • MAC • D3
Your Team Fit
435
Recruit median
430
In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.
Stevenson University
Women • MAC • D3
Your Team Fit
412
Recruit median
410
In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.
Alfred University
Women • Empire 8 • D3
Your Team Fit
470
Recruit median
400
Above this program's typical recruit median — you're a top-of-class addition.
Selection: Realistic-tier first (sorted by Team Fit), padded with closest Reach or Stretch only if fewer than 5 Realistic matches exist. Display order: D1 → D2 → D3 within the picks. How is this calculated?
Custom college fit
Pick a specific school to see the full per-event analysis.
682 programs catalogued across NCAA D1, D2, and D3. Roughly half have real scraped rosters; the rest run on calibrated placeholder data while the T-166 cleanup expands coverage.