Swimmer profile
Alana Tucker
Female15-16Jets Aquatic ClubAR · CENTRAL
SR Rating
NCAA D1 cut anchored • 2026 seasonBased on current PBs vs. NCAA D1 cut times.
- #150 Free SCY29.44433
- #2200 Free SCY2:19.61432
- #3100 Free SCY1:04.80422
- #4500 Free SCY6:21.32412
Trajectory projected to end of high-school junior year — recruiting peak.
- #150 Free SCY27.46534
- #2200 Free SCY2:13.17498
- #3500 Free SCY6:05.49468
- #4100 Free SCY1:03.06458
College junior year. Range reflects developmental uncertainty — wider for younger swimmers and late developers.
- #150 Free SCY24.91716
- #2200 Free SCY2:04.65607
- #3500 Free SCY5:44.44559
- #4200 IM SCY2:25.33534
Refine your College CeilingTesting
Tell us about your swimmer’s growth. We use trajectory data by default; your input fine-tunes the ceiling range. Not saved — refresh resets to default.
What this means for Alana
Building toward recruiting peak — currently Building Base.
Recruiting conversations start in earnest at the end of sophomore year (NCAA contact rules let coaches reach out June 15 of sophomore year for most sports including swimming). Your projected rating (505 → Building Base) is the more meaningful number for that window. Continue building broad event coverage — the top-4 weighting rewards multiple strong events.
Maturity context: Your data shows late-developer trajectory — continued steep improvement past age 15. That's exactly the kind of pattern that under-rates well-developed seniors but signals strong upside.
What time drops unlock D2/D3 Realistic
Each row shows the time required in that event alone to push SR Rating Current from 430 to 600, holding the other three events fixed. Only physiologically reachable drops (≤15% per event) are shown. In practice swimmers improve across multiple events at once, so real progress will lift faster than these single-event deltas suggest.
No single-event drop within reachable bounds gets 430 all the way to 600. The gap from Building Base to D2/D3 Realistic closes through broad improvement — multiple events moving together. That’s exactly what college coaches want to see; specialists rarely make this jump on one event alone.
Best school matches
Top 5 of 149 curated programs that actually fit. Use the picker below to evaluate any other school.
Illinois Wesleyan University
Women • CCIW • D3
Your Team Fit
513
Recruit median
470
In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.
Hope College
Women • MIAA • D3
Your Team Fit
513
Recruit median
470
In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.
Loras College
Women • ARC • D3
Your Team Fit
437
Recruit median
420
In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.
Bryn Mawr College
Women • Centennial • D3
Your Team Fit
437
Recruit median
410
In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.
Hanover College
Women • HCAC • D3
Your Team Fit
437
Recruit median
400
In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.
Selection: Realistic-tier first (sorted by Team Fit), padded with closest Reach or Stretch only if fewer than 5 Realistic matches exist. Display order: D1 → D2 → D3 within the picks. How is this calculated?
Custom college fit
Pick a specific school to see the full per-event analysis.
682 programs catalogued across NCAA D1, D2, and D3. Roughly half have real scraped rosters; the rest run on calibrated placeholder data while the T-166 cleanup expands coverage.