Swimmer profile

Amanda Vileikis

Female17-18FMC AquaticIL · CENTRAL

SR Rating

NCAA D1 cut anchored • 2026 season
Late developerage 18
Current (today)
860
D1 Mid-Major

Based on current PBs vs. NCAA D1 cut times.

  • #1100 Breast SCY1:02.88882
  • #2200 Breast SCY2:17.78865
  • #3400 IM SCY4:30.08824
  • #4200 IM SCY2:07.84784
Projected
860
D1 Mid-Major

You're at or past recruiting peak. SR Projected here equals SR Current — no forward projection is applied past age 17.

  • #1100 Breast SCY1:02.88882
  • #2200 Breast SCY2:17.78865
  • #3400 IM SCY4:30.08824
  • #4200 IM SCY2:07.84784
College Ceiling (age 21)
954range 8601042
D1 Power 4

College junior year. Range reflects developmental uncertainty — wider for younger swimmers and late developers.

  • #1200 Breast SCY2:11.241001
  • #2100 Breast SCY1:01.35950
  • #3400 IM SCY4:23.98882
  • #4200 IM SCY2:03.84863
Coach viewPIe ≈ 10(812)typical outcome D1 (72%)

Refine your College CeilingTesting

Tell us about your swimmer’s growth. We use trajectory data by default; your input fine-tunes the ceiling range. Not saved — refresh resets to default.

What this means for Amanda

D1 Mid-Major recruit, D1 Power 4 ceiling.

Recruiting window is active. Your optimistic ceiling projects to D1 Power 4 territory through college junior year. The meaningful gap between Current and Ceiling reflects college-years upside coaches should weigh in their evaluation — particularly if biological maturation is still ongoing.

Maturity context: Data flags continued improvement well past age 15 — bring this trajectory to recruiting visits as part of the evaluation story.

What time drops unlock D1 Power 4

Each row shows the time required in that event alone to push SR Rating Current from 860 to 950, holding the other three events fixed. Only physiologically reachable drops (≤15% per event) are shown. In practice swimmers improve across multiple events at once, so real progress will lift faster than these single-event deltas suggest.

EventCurrentTargetΔ
100 Breast SCY1:02.8858.20−4.68s
200 Breast SCY2:17.782:07.34−10.44s

Best school matches

Top 5 of 169 curated programs that actually fit. Use the picker below to evaluate any other school.

Pilot data

Michigan Technological University

WomenGLIACD2

Match

Your Team Fit

917

Recruit median

850

In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.

Northern Michigan University

WomenGLIACD2

Match

Your Team Fit

917

Recruit median

890

In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.

Missouri University of Science and Tech

WomenGLVCD2

Match

Your Team Fit

917

Recruit median

880

In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.

Southern Connecticut State University

WomenNE-10D2

Match

Your Team Fit

917

Recruit median

840

In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.

Carson-Newman University

WomenSACD2

Match

Your Team Fit

917

Recruit median

870

In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.

Selection: Realistic-tier first (sorted by Team Fit), padded with closest Reach or Stretch only if fewer than 5 Realistic matches exist. Display order: D1 → D2 → D3 within the picks. How is this calculated?

Custom college fit

Pick a specific school to see the full per-event analysis.

682 programs catalogued across NCAA D1, D2, and D3. Roughly half have real scraped rosters; the rest run on calibrated placeholder data while the T-166 cleanup expands coverage.