Swimmer profile
Emily Zimmerman
Female15-16Occoquan SwimmingPV · EASTERN
SR Rating
NCAA D1 cut anchored • 2026 seasonBased on current PBs vs. NCAA D1 cut times.
- #11650 Free SCY18:23.94711
- #2500 Free SCY5:23.22676
- #3200 Back SCY2:13.19640
- #4400 IM SCY4:56.92620
Trajectory projected to end of high-school junior year — recruiting peak.
- #11650 Free SCY17:17.28857
- #2500 Free SCY5:08.22780
- #3200 Back SCY2:06.10755
- #4200 IM SCY2:09.64752
College junior year. Range reflects developmental uncertainty — wider for younger swimmers and late developers.
- #11650 Free SCYCONF15:50.671113
- #2100 Breast SCY58.451098
- #3200 IM SCY1:54.791083
- #4500 Free SCY4:48.39952
Refine your College CeilingTesting
Tell us about your swimmer’s growth. We use trajectory data by default; your input fine-tunes the ceiling range. Not saved — refresh resets to default.
What this means for Emily
Building toward recruiting peak — currently D2/D3 Realistic.
Recruiting conversations start in earnest at the end of sophomore year (NCAA contact rules let coaches reach out June 15 of sophomore year for most sports including swimming). Your projected rating (804 → D1 Mid-Major) is the more meaningful number for that window. Continue building broad event coverage — the top-4 weighting rewards multiple strong events.
Maturity context: Your data shows late-developer trajectory — continued steep improvement past age 15. That's exactly the kind of pattern that under-rates well-developed seniors but signals strong upside.
What time drops unlock D1 Mid-Major
Each row shows the time required in that event alone to push SR Rating Current from 681 to 750, holding the other three events fixed. Only physiologically reachable drops (≤15% per event) are shown. In practice swimmers improve across multiple events at once, so real progress will lift faster than these single-event deltas suggest.
| Event | Current | Target | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1650 Free SCY | 18:23.94 | 17:04.80 | −79.14s |
| 500 Free SCY | 5:23.22 | 4:59.03 | −24.19s |
Best school matches
Top 5 of 169 curated programs that actually fit. Use the picker below to evaluate any other school.
Widener University
Women • MAC • D3
Your Team Fit
441
Recruit median
420
In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.
Johns Hopkins University
Women • Centennial • D3
Your Team Fit
803
Recruit median
730
Above this program's typical recruit median — you're a top-of-class addition.
Franklin & Marshall College
Women • Centennial • D3
Your Team Fit
803
Recruit median
560
Above this program's typical recruit median — you're a top-of-class addition.
Gettysburg College
Women • Centennial • D3
Your Team Fit
803
Recruit median
550
Above this program's typical recruit median — you're a top-of-class addition.
Swarthmore College
Women • Centennial • D3
Your Team Fit
803
Recruit median
540
Above this program's typical recruit median — you're a top-of-class addition.
Selection: Realistic-tier first (sorted by Team Fit), padded with closest Reach or Stretch only if fewer than 5 Realistic matches exist. Display order: D1 → D2 → D3 within the picks. How is this calculated?
Custom college fit
Pick a specific school to see the full per-event analysis.
682 programs catalogued across NCAA D1, D2, and D3. Roughly half have real scraped rosters; the rest run on calibrated placeholder data while the T-166 cleanup expands coverage.