Swimmer profile
Olive Osterloh
Female15-16Brownell TalbotMW · CENTRAL
SR Rating
NCAA D1 cut anchored • 2026 seasonBased on current PBs vs. NCAA D1 cut times.
- #150 Free SCY28.51477
- #2100 Free SCY1:02.55469
- #3200 IM SCY2:36.27429
- #4100 Breast SCY1:22.39392
Trajectory projected to end of high-school junior year — recruiting peak.
- #150 Free SCY24.34767
- #2100 Free SCY56.18647
- #3200 IM SCY2:34.32446
- #4200 Back SCY2:31.24437
College junior year. Range reflects developmental uncertainty — wider for younger swimmers and late developers.
- #150 Free SCYCONF21.171166
- #2100 Free SCY48.341016
- #3200 Back SCY2:17.58581
- #4200 Breast SCY2:47.19484
Refine your College CeilingTesting
Tell us about your swimmer’s growth. We use trajectory data by default; your input fine-tunes the ceiling range. Not saved — refresh resets to default.
What this means for Olive
Building toward recruiting peak — currently Building Base.
Recruiting conversations start in earnest at the end of sophomore year (NCAA contact rules let coaches reach out June 15 of sophomore year for most sports including swimming). Your projected rating (649 → D2/D3 Realistic) is the more meaningful number for that window. Continue building broad event coverage — the top-4 weighting rewards multiple strong events.
Maturity context: Your data shows late-developer trajectory — continued steep improvement past age 15. That's exactly the kind of pattern that under-rates well-developed seniors but signals strong upside.
What time drops unlock D2/D3 Realistic
Each row shows the time required in that event alone to push SR Rating Current from 461 to 600, holding the other three events fixed. Only physiologically reachable drops (≤15% per event) are shown. In practice swimmers improve across multiple events at once, so real progress will lift faster than these single-event deltas suggest.
No single-event drop within reachable bounds gets 461 all the way to 600. The gap from Building Base to D2/D3 Realistic closes through broad improvement — multiple events moving together. That’s exactly what college coaches want to see; specialists rarely make this jump on one event alone.
Best school matches
Top 5 of 150 curated programs that actually fit. Use the picker below to evaluate any other school.
Illinois Wesleyan University
Women • CCIW • D3
Your Team Fit
511
Recruit median
470
In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.
Hope College
Women • MIAA • D3
Your Team Fit
511
Recruit median
470
In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.
Washington College
Women • Centennial • D3
Your Team Fit
483
Recruit median
440
In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.
University of Scranton
Women • Landmark • D3
Your Team Fit
480
Recruit median
460
In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.
Luther College
Women • ARC • D3
Your Team Fit
470
Recruit median
430
In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.
Selection: Realistic-tier first (sorted by Team Fit), padded with closest Reach or Stretch only if fewer than 5 Realistic matches exist. Display order: D1 → D2 → D3 within the picks. How is this calculated?
Custom college fit
Pick a specific school to see the full per-event analysis.
682 programs catalogued across NCAA D1, D2, and D3. Roughly half have real scraped rosters; the rest run on calibrated placeholder data while the T-166 cleanup expands coverage.