Swimmer profile
Miriam Schrimpf
Female15-16Greater Columbus Swim Tm Of OhOH · CENTRAL
SR Rating
NCAA D1 cut anchored • 2026 seasonBased on current PBs vs. NCAA D1 cut times.
- #1100 Fly SCY58.84711
- #2100 Back SCY59.76684
- #3400 IM SCY4:50.32663
- #4200 IM SCY2:16.36646
Trajectory projected to end of high-school junior year — recruiting peak.
- #1100 Fly SCY54.94874
- #2200 Fly SCY2:04.94824
- #3400 IM SCY4:31.63810
- #4100 Back SCY57.01788
College junior year. Range reflects developmental uncertainty — wider for younger swimmers and late developers.
- #1200 Fly SCYCONF1:51.251167
- #2100 Fly SCYCONF49.921165
- #3400 IM SCY4:07.461071
- #4200 Free SCY1:46.67968
Refine your College CeilingTesting
Tell us about your swimmer’s growth. We use trajectory data by default; your input fine-tunes the ceiling range. Not saved — refresh resets to default.
What this means for Miriam
Building toward recruiting peak — currently D2/D3 Realistic.
Recruiting conversations start in earnest at the end of sophomore year (NCAA contact rules let coaches reach out June 15 of sophomore year for most sports including swimming). Your projected rating (839 → D1 Mid-Major) is the more meaningful number for that window. Continue building broad event coverage — the top-4 weighting rewards multiple strong events.
Maturity context: Your data shows late-developer trajectory — continued steep improvement past age 15. That's exactly the kind of pattern that under-rates well-developed seniors but signals strong upside.
What time drops unlock D1 Mid-Major
Each row shows the time required in that event alone to push SR Rating Current from 689 to 750, holding the other three events fixed. Only physiologically reachable drops (≤15% per event) are shown. In practice swimmers improve across multiple events at once, so real progress will lift faster than these single-event deltas suggest.
| Event | Current | Target | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| 100 Fly SCY | 58.84 | 55.06 | −3.78s |
| 100 Back SCY | 59.76 | 55.79 | −3.97s |
| 400 IM SCY | 4:50.32 | 4:09.52 | −40.80s |
Best school matches
Top 5 of 169 curated programs that actually fit. Use the picker below to evaluate any other school.
Harding University
Women • GAC • D2
Your Team Fit
889
Recruit median
810
In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.
Henderson State University
Women • GAC • D2
Your Team Fit
889
Recruit median
830
In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.
Michigan Technological University
Women • GLIAC • D2
Your Team Fit
889
Recruit median
850
In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.
Maryville University
Women • GLVC • D2
Your Team Fit
889
Recruit median
820
In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.
Missouri University of Science and Tech
Women • GLVC • D2
Your Team Fit
889
Recruit median
880
In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.
Selection: Realistic-tier first (sorted by Team Fit), padded with closest Reach or Stretch only if fewer than 5 Realistic matches exist. Display order: D1 → D2 → D3 within the picks. How is this calculated?
Custom college fit
Pick a specific school to see the full per-event analysis.
682 programs catalogued across NCAA D1, D2, and D3. Roughly half have real scraped rosters; the rest run on calibrated placeholder data while the T-166 cleanup expands coverage.