Swimmer profile
Sophia Marmolejo
Female15-16Sunrise SwimmingFGC · SOUTHERN
SR Rating
NCAA D1 cut anchored • 2026 seasonBased on current PBs vs. NCAA D1 cut times.
- #1200 Free SCY2:16.89458
- #2100 Free SCY1:03.17455
- #350 Free SCY29.18445
- #4500 Free SCY6:13.17439
Trajectory projected to end of high-school junior year — recruiting peak.
- #1200 IM SCY2:19.30606
- #21650 Free SCY19:39.76583
- #3200 Free SCY2:08.58553
- #450 Free SCY27.28545
College junior year. Range reflects developmental uncertainty — wider for younger swimmers and late developers.
- #1200 IM SCY1:56.361040
- #2200 Breast SCY2:12.79966
- #3200 Fly SCY2:01.48896
- #41650 Free SCY17:04.40890
Refine your College CeilingTesting
Tell us about your swimmer’s growth. We use trajectory data by default; your input fine-tunes the ceiling range. Not saved — refresh resets to default.
What this means for Sophia
Building toward recruiting peak — currently Building Base.
Recruiting conversations start in earnest at the end of sophomore year (NCAA contact rules let coaches reach out June 15 of sophomore year for most sports including swimming). Your projected rating (585 → Building Base) is the more meaningful number for that window. Continue building broad event coverage — the top-4 weighting rewards multiple strong events.
Maturity context: Your data shows late-developer trajectory — continued steep improvement past age 15. That's exactly the kind of pattern that under-rates well-developed seniors but signals strong upside.
What time drops unlock D2/D3 Realistic
Each row shows the time required in that event alone to push SR Rating Current from 454 to 600, holding the other three events fixed. Only physiologically reachable drops (≤15% per event) are shown. In practice swimmers improve across multiple events at once, so real progress will lift faster than these single-event deltas suggest.
No single-event drop within reachable bounds gets 454 all the way to 600. The gap from Building Base to D2/D3 Realistic closes through broad improvement — multiple events moving together. That’s exactly what college coaches want to see; specialists rarely make this jump on one event alone.
Best school matches
Top 5 of 153 curated programs that actually fit. Use the picker below to evaluate any other school.
Dickinson College
Women • Centennial • D3
Your Team Fit
542
Recruit median
500
In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.
Swarthmore College
Women • Centennial • D3
Your Team Fit
542
Recruit median
540
In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.
Luther College
Women • ARC • D3
Your Team Fit
465
Recruit median
430
In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.
Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology
Women • HCAC • D3
Your Team Fit
465
Recruit median
430
In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.
Susquehanna University
Women • MAC • D3
Your Team Fit
441
Recruit median
430
In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.
Selection: Realistic-tier first (sorted by Team Fit), padded with closest Reach or Stretch only if fewer than 5 Realistic matches exist. Display order: D1 → D2 → D3 within the picks. How is this calculated?
Custom college fit
Pick a specific school to see the full per-event analysis.
682 programs catalogued across NCAA D1, D2, and D3. Roughly half have real scraped rosters; the rest run on calibrated placeholder data while the T-166 cleanup expands coverage.