Swimmer profile

Briggs Borchardt

Male15-16Schroeder Swim Team / YMCA of Metro MilwaukeeWI · CENTRAL

SR Rating

NCAA D1 cut anchored • 2026 season
Late developerage 15
Current (today)
660
D2/D3 Realistic

Based on current PBs vs. NCAA D1 cut times.

  • #1200 Back SCY1:56.39676
  • #2200 IM SCY1:59.51662
  • #3100 Back SCY53.68641
  • #4100 Free SCY50.75589
Projected (age 17)
875
D1 Mid-Major

Trajectory projected to end of high-school junior year — recruiting peak.

  • #1200 IM SCY1:43.301024
  • #2100 Back SCY48.98844
  • #3200 Back SCY1:56.39676
  • #4200 Free SCY1:49.03639
College Ceiling (age 21)
1057range 6601058
D1 Power 4

College junior year. Range reflects developmental uncertainty — wider for younger swimmers and late developers.

  • #1200 IM SCYCONF1:38.921167
  • #2100 Back SCYCONF43.981166
  • #3200 Back SCY1:56.39676
  • #4100 Free SCY49.03654
Coach viewPIe ≈ 33(2838)typical outcome D3 (86%)

Refine your College CeilingTesting

Tell us about your swimmer’s growth. We use trajectory data by default; your input fine-tunes the ceiling range. Not saved — refresh resets to default.

What this means for Briggs

Building toward recruiting peak — currently D2/D3 Realistic.

Recruiting conversations start in earnest at the end of sophomore year (NCAA contact rules let coaches reach out June 15 of sophomore year for most sports including swimming). Your projected rating (875 → D1 Mid-Major) is the more meaningful number for that window. Continue building broad event coverage — the top-4 weighting rewards multiple strong events.

Maturity context: Your data shows late-developer trajectory — continued steep improvement past age 15. That's exactly the kind of pattern that under-rates well-developed seniors but signals strong upside.

What time drops unlock D1 Mid-Major

Each row shows the time required in that event alone to push SR Rating Current from 660 to 750, holding the other three events fixed. Only physiologically reachable drops (≤15% per event) are shown. In practice swimmers improve across multiple events at once, so real progress will lift faster than these single-event deltas suggest.

EventCurrentTargetΔ
200 Back SCY1:56.391:45.48−10.91s
200 IM SCY1:59.511:48.11−11.40s

Best school matches

Top 5 of 133 curated programs that actually fit. Use the picker below to evaluate any other school.

Pilot data

Michigan Technological University

MenGLIACD2

Match

Your Team Fit

898

Recruit median

840

In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.

Missouri University of Science and Tech

MenGLVCD2

Match

Your Team Fit

898

Recruit median

870

In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.

Azusa Pacific University

MenPacWestD2

Match

Your Team Fit

898

Recruit median

860

In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.

Concordia University Irvine

MenPacWestD2

Match

Your Team Fit

898

Recruit median

840

In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.

Carson-Newman University

MenSACD2

Match

Your Team Fit

898

Recruit median

850

In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.

Selection: Realistic-tier first (sorted by Team Fit), padded with closest Reach or Stretch only if fewer than 5 Realistic matches exist. Display order: D1 → D2 → D3 within the picks. How is this calculated?

Custom college fit

Pick a specific school to see the full per-event analysis.

682 programs catalogued across NCAA D1, D2, and D3. Roughly half have real scraped rosters; the rest run on calibrated placeholder data while the T-166 cleanup expands coverage.