Swimmer profile

Caroline Forhetz

Female15-16Missouri State AquaticsMV · CENTRAL

SR Rating

NCAA D1 cut anchored • 2026 season
age 16
Current (today)
510
Building Base

Based on current PBs vs. NCAA D1 cut times.

  • #1100 Breast SCY1:15.19516
  • #250 Free SCY27.90509
  • #3100 Free SCY1:00.88509
  • #4200 Breast SCY2:46.98486
Projected (age 17)
516
Building Base

Trajectory projected to end of high-school junior year — recruiting peak.

  • #1100 Breast SCY1:14.62528
  • #250 Free SCY27.90509
  • #3100 Free SCY1:00.88509
  • #4200 IM SCY2:28.66499
College Ceiling (age 21)
527range 510586
Building Base

College junior year. Range reflects developmental uncertainty — wider for younger swimmers and late developers.

  • #1100 Breast SCY1:13.94542
  • #2200 IM SCY2:26.55520
  • #350 Free SCY27.90509
  • #4100 Free SCY1:00.88509
Coach viewPIe ≈ 60(4068)typical outcome D3 (92%)
Why the College Ceiling lineup differs: 200 IM SCY is improving fastest vs. the NCAA D1 cut, so it ranks into the top 4 at age 21 even though it isn't in today’s top 4. That’s a real recruiting signal — shows which event projects as the strongest college pathway.

Refine your College CeilingTesting

Tell us about your swimmer’s growth. We use trajectory data by default; your input fine-tunes the ceiling range. Not saved — refresh resets to default.

What this means for Caroline

Building toward recruiting peak — currently Building Base.

Recruiting conversations start in earnest at the end of sophomore year (NCAA contact rules let coaches reach out June 15 of sophomore year for most sports including swimming). Your projected rating (516 → Building Base) is the more meaningful number for that window. Continue building broad event coverage — the top-4 weighting rewards multiple strong events.

What time drops unlock D2/D3 Realistic

Each row shows the time required in that event alone to push SR Rating Current from 510 to 600, holding the other three events fixed. Only physiologically reachable drops (≤15% per event) are shown. In practice swimmers improve across multiple events at once, so real progress will lift faster than these single-event deltas suggest.

EventCurrentTargetΔ
100 Breast SCY1:15.191:06.49−8.70s
50 Free SCY27.9024.64−3.26s

Best school matches

Top 5 of 152 curated programs that actually fit. Use the picker below to evaluate any other school.

Pilot data

Swarthmore College

WomenCentennialD3

Match

Your Team Fit

568

Recruit median

540

In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.

William Smith College

WomenLiberty LeagueD3

Match

Your Team Fit

485

Recruit median

470

In line with this program's typical recruit — a natural fit.

Luther College

WomenARCD3

Safety

Your Team Fit

492

Recruit median

430

Above this program's typical recruit median — you're a top-of-class addition.

Loras College

WomenARCD3

Safety

Your Team Fit

485

Recruit median

420

Above this program's typical recruit median — you're a top-of-class addition.

Coe College

WomenARCD3

Safety

Your Team Fit

459

Recruit median

390

Above this program's typical recruit median — you're a top-of-class addition.

Selection: Realistic-tier first (sorted by Team Fit), padded with closest Reach or Stretch only if fewer than 5 Realistic matches exist. Display order: D1 → D2 → D3 within the picks. How is this calculated?

Custom college fit

Pick a specific school to see the full per-event analysis.

682 programs catalogued across NCAA D1, D2, and D3. Roughly half have real scraped rosters; the rest run on calibrated placeholder data while the T-166 cleanup expands coverage.